Turn 1 · model calls

The full recorded input, reasoning, tool calls and lifecycle of every model call placed on turn 1, grouped by seat. Each call has its own anchor (#d-<id>). The same records are rows of decisions.jsonl.

Previous turn's calls · Next turn's calls

Model calls linked to this turn

Calls with an accepted-event join or a recorded refusal in this turn.

alice-legacy-p0006

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 6. Active turn: False.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #8 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ADVISORY — bob is on the move; you cannot act.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
  Bob is the collector for blue/yellow/red; Alice retains black cards and collects black, with cures at Atlanta unless a nearer station is built. Alice handles the western/European armed bomb Madrid when reachable; Bob/Dispatcher covers the distant Beijing red and Buenos Aires yellow threats, splitting targets rather than doubling. Reassess each turn and prioritize any supply warning/3-cube cluster; rendezvous San Francisco for Alice's San Francisco blue card if bob's blue set is ready to receive.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Madrid
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=4 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:18 black:21 red:17   decks: player=47 infection=37   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 7 move(s): New York→Toronto→Chicago→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing — nearer teammate: bob, 5 move(s) vs your 7 — or FREE via airlift (you hold it — 0 actions, moves any pawn)
  Buenos Aires: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] — 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Buenos Aires — or FREE via airlift (you hold it — 0 actions, moves any pawn)
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 4 move(s): New York→Toronto→Chicago→Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 4
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard]
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Algiers→Cairo→Baghdad→Tehran→Delhi
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 47 cards → 23 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (1/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  black: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (3 move(s))
  red: bob collects (1/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  hand Mexico City(yellow) to bob: meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  hand San Francisco(blue) to bob: meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 4 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
station opportunities (stations enable cures and shuttle travel):
  as Operations Expert you can buildStation HERE (Madrid) for free — no card needed (saves ~3 action(s) on remaining cure runs: black 3→0)
      response reach — team's card-free trip to each city: Madrid 3→0 (2 cubes), Paris 4→1, Algiers 4→1, Milan 5→2; board-wide: 23 cities closer, 53 trip-actions shaved

If you have useful advice for the active player, CALL the send_message
tool — advice written as plain text is discarded, never delivered.
If you have nothing useful to add, just stop.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Considering strategies for Bob's turn**

I need to think through Bob's options for the game. He can potentially airlift to Beijing, but I hold the card for that event. Since he’s working as a dispatcher, he can move pawns, possibly enabling him to reposition me to Buenos Aires. If Bob moves Alice as another pawn, that might let him strategically navigate to distant cities like Madrid. I need to plan how to effectively use our resources with the crisis fires in play.**Analyzing moves and strategies**

Bob can reach Buenos Aires in two moves from Atlanta, stopping at Miami and Bogota. He can also jump pawns to reposition. To treat Buenos Aires, he'll need three actions. However, moving to Beijing takes five moves, and he has only four actions available. The dispatcher can move any pawn, but the same movement counts towards action limits. The red supply threat is concerning, so my message should suggest he handle Buenos Aires first to preserve resources and deal with the outbreak.

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Madrid reduced to 2 blue. On your turn, Buenos Aires is the fastest 3-cube bomb (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, then treat with 4 actions); Beijing is 5 moves and red supply only 17, so use dispatcher positioning if it buys the Beijing response. I hold the airlift event, usable on my next turn only."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text:

Madrid is down to 2 blue. I advised Bob to prioritize Buenos Aires, the nearest remaining 3-cube bomb, and flagged that I’m holding Airlift for my next turn.

toolCalls: []

alice-legacy-p0007

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 7. Active turn: False.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #12 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from bob (event #9): I’m taking the verified 4-action Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires + treat line, reducing BA from 3 to 2 without spending cure cards. Beijing remains the armed red threat (supply 17); my 5-move route can’t cover both this turn. Alice’s held Airlift is ideal to reach Beijing next turn.
Reply via send_message only if it helps; otherwise continue or stop.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Agreed. I’ll use my Airlift on my next turn to place myself at Beijing and treat red; please handle Buenos Aires now and keep your cure cards intact."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 2 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text:

Agreed: Bob is handling Buenos Aires now, and I’ll use Airlift to reach Beijing on my next turn.

toolCalls: []

bob-legacy-p0004

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 4. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #9 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
• Event #10 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
• Event #11 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

{"kind": "supersede", "hit": true}

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from alice (event #8): Madrid reduced to 2 blue. On your turn, Buenos Aires is the fastest 3-cube bomb (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, then treat with 4 actions); Beijing is 5 moves and red supply only 17, so use dispatcher positioning if it buys the Beijing response. I hold the airlift event, usable on my next turn only.

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  Bob is the collector for blue/yellow/red; Alice retains black cards and collects black, with cures at Atlanta unless a nearer station is built. Alice handles the western/European armed bomb Madrid when reachable; Bob/Dispatcher covers the distant Beijing red and Buenos Aires yellow threats, splitting targets rather than doubling. Reassess each turn and prioritize any supply warning/3-cube cluster; rendezvous San Francisco for Alice's San Francisco blue card if bob's blue set is ready to receive.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 4 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Atlanta
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=4 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:18 black:21 red:17   decks: player=47 infection=37   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 5 move(s): Chicago→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing
  Buenos Aires: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] — 3 move(s): Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Washington→New York→Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 2/5 blue set — burning drops it to 1/5; 9 blue in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 0 move(s) vs your 3
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Chicago→Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Chicago→San Francisco→Manila→Hong Kong→Bangkok — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Bangkok — your 1/5 red set — burning drops it to 0/5; 11 red in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 47 cards → 23 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Buenos Aires(yellow): drive alice 2 step(s) to Buenos Aires → then that pawn treats
  Beijing(red): drive bob 5 step(s) to Beijing → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (0 move(s))
  yellow: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Atlanta (0 move(s))
  black: alice collects (2/5) — give alice your black cards when you share
  red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Atlanta (0 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you San Francisco(blue): meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~23 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - take San Francisco — the blue handoff without the crossing (3 still needed) — drive Chicago, drive San Francisco, jump alice onto bob, take San Francisco from alice
     tempo: 7 action(s) closer to the blue cure (42 → 35 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Miami, drive Bogota, drive Buenos Aires, treat yellow
     tempo: 3 action(s) further from the yellow cure (57 → 60 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  exchange "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires": gives up 10 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 2 → 1 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo -4 vs -3, risk 0.70 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "take Madrid from alice" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "take Madrid from alice" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go San Francisco" — tempo -2 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -2 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -4 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "jump alice to Atlanta" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -5 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -4 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "take Mexico City from alice" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Buenos Aires" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -5 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo 1 vs 7, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take San Francisco — the blue handoff without t…"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Chicago"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Miami"}
  [4] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Washington"}
  directFlight — 4 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bangkok", "Bogota"
  [9] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [10] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [11] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"London"}
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"New York"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Algiers"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Tehran"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"San Francisco"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mumbai"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Considering movement strategy**

I'm thinking about how to move Alice from Madrid to Buenos Aires using the dispatcher. It seems like I can do this by moving Alice to São Paulo first, and then to Buenos Aires via Bogotá, which would involve two moves. Once Alice reaches Buenos Aires, she could treat. Bob might also need to take action afterward. I need to keep in mind that Alice can only make specific moves and actions due to her limitations. It’s a lot to juggle!**Evaluating teammate movements**

I'm considering the best choice for the teammate near Buenos Aires based on their role as Dispatcher. I could dispatch Alice by moving her two steps: first to São Paulo and then to Buenos Aires. After that, she could treat once she arrives, leaving her with one action. The rules seem to indicate that the Dispatcher can reposition pawns, but treatment actions can only occur at the current location of the active player. So, Bob needs to act carefully!**Assessing next moves**

I see that there’s still a danger in Beijing, so I’m weighing whether to hand off the cure progress in San Francisco. To do this, I'd need to drive from Atlanta to San Francisco, which involves a couple of steps. I can move Alice to Bob using the Dispatcher rules, but the share restrictions still apply to them. If Bob has a blue card, he can help improve the cure pipeline, but it seems we still need a few more actions to be fully ready. Risk is definitely a consideration here!**Considering game strategy**

I'm thinking about how to navigate the game situation with Alice and Bob. Alice can move from Madrid to Buenos Aires, using two actions, but Bob has limited options. He needs to build a station in Atlanta to help facilitate movement. Bob has only two actions left, so he could move to Chicago to treat a blue disease there. However, Alice can't treat in Buenos Aires until her next turn, and if infection happens first, it complicates things. My strategy needs to be cautious!**Planning game actions**

This turn, I can treat Buenos Aires in four actions, which is great! I need to formulate a solid plan since we can’t reverse our actions. I want to build a route from Miami to Bogota to Buenos Aires while treating the yellow disease. I also need to check the current situation, ensuring everything's in order. Bob seems to be covering Buenos Aires and Beijing, while Alice can now manage Madrid since it's been reduced. I really want to stay organized in this plan!

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Miami"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Miami"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Atlanta"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Washington"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "St. Petersburg"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bangkok"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "alice", "toPawn": "bob"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "London"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "New York"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Paris"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Sao Paulo"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Algiers"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}]}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, "legalAfter": "  {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n  driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"Miami\", \"Mexico City\", \"Lima\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\"\n  {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"Madrid\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"St. Petersburg\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"Bangkok\"}\n  charterFlight — 47 options; build {\"tag\":\"charterFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n  {\"tag\":\"buildStation\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherJump\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"toPawn\":\"bob\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherJump\",\"pawn\":\"bob\",\"toPawn\":\"alice\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"London\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"New York\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Paris\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Sao Paulo\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Algiers\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"Tehran\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"San Francisco\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"Mumbai\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"dispatcherMove\",\"pawn\":\"alice\",\"via\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":\"Mexico City\"}"}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Sao Paulo"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "St. Petersburg"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bangkok"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "alice", "toPawn": "bob"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "London"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "New York"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Paris"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Sao Paulo"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Algiers"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}]}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Buenos Aires", "color": "yellow", "before": 3, "after": 2}], "moves": [{"player": "bob", "from": "Atlanta", "to": "Buenos Aires"}], "hands": [], "stationsBuilt": [], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "directFlight", "count": 4, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "count": 2, "example": {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "alice", "toPawn": "bob"}}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "count": 9, "example": {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "London"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 4, "deckSize": 47, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0.18181818181818177, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 37, "perCityHitProbability": 0.05405405405405406, "threats": [{"city": "Madrid", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Beijing", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Buenos Aires", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Delhi", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}]}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "bob", "currentHandSize": 4, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": false}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "black", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Exploring action plans**

I'm considering a plan where I take action to address the BA situation, which involves reducing risk and ensuring I can't reach Beijing in time. It sounds like I'm set to use an airlift to Beijing next turn. I want to pin this plan and think about flexibility in case of changes. Bob is covering Beijing and BA while Alice handles Madrid. I’m pondering if we should revise our plan now and make sure communication is clear. This could involve sending and pinning updates together.

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "I’m taking the verified 4-action Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires + treat line, reducing BA from 3 to 2 without spending cure cards. Beijing remains the armed red threat (supply 17); my 5-move route can’t cover both this turn. Alice’s held Airlift is ideal to reach Beijing next turn."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}
{"tool": "pin_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered."}, "output": {"pinned": true, "note": "This replaces the standing team plan; both players will see it every turn until superseded. You have sent 2 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 3 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Miami"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Miami"}}}

bob-legacy-p0006

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 6. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #13 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

{"kind": "supersede", "hit": true}

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from alice (event #12): Agreed. I’ll use my Airlift on my next turn to place myself at Beijing and treat red; please handle Buenos Aires now and keep your cure cards intact.

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 3 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 4 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 3)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Miami
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Miami(dispatcher) hand=4 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:18 black:21 red:17   decks: player=47 infection=37   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 6 move(s): Atlanta→Chicago→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing
  Buenos Aires: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] — 2 move(s): Bogota→Buenos Aires
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Washington→New York→Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 2/5 blue set — burning drops it to 1/5; 9 blue in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 0 move(s) vs your 3
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles→Sydney→Jakarta→Bangkok — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Bangkok — your 1/5 red set — burning drops it to 0/5; 11 red in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 47 cards → 23 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Buenos Aires(yellow): drive alice 2 step(s) to Buenos Aires → then that pawn treats
  Beijing(red): drive bob 6 step(s) to Beijing → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (1 move(s))
  yellow: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Atlanta (1 move(s))
  black: alice collects (2/5) — give alice your black cards when you share
  red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Atlanta (1 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you San Francisco(blue): meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 3 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~23 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without the crossing (4 still needed) — drive Mexico City, jump alice onto bob, take Mexico City from alice
     tempo: 6 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (57 → 51 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Atlanta, drive Chicago, drive San Francisco
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the blue cure (44 → 42 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires; en route to clear red at Beijing — worth ~5 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Bogota, drive Buenos Aires, treat yellow
     tempo: 2 action(s) further from the red cure (66 → 68 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  exchange "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing": gives up 4 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires": gives up 4 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 2 → 1 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "take Madrid from alice" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Tehran" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "jump alice to Miami" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Atlanta", "Washington", "Mexico City", "Bogota"
  directFlight — 4 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bangkok", "Bogota"
  [10] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [11] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"London"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"New York"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Algiers"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Tehran"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"San Francisco"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mumbai"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Planning travel actions**

I’m in the middle of organizing my next steps. First, I need to focus on Bogota, then move on to Buenos Aires, and finally handle some other task afterward. I don’t think I need another preview since that’s been covered already. So, I’ll submit the action related to Bogota now and keep things moving forward! This feels organized. Let's get these actions sorted!

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}}}

bob-legacy-p0007

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 7. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #14 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
• Event #15 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 2 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 4 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 2)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Bogota
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Bogota(dispatcher) hand=4 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:18 black:21 red:17   decks: player=47 infection=37   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 6 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing
  Buenos Aires: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] — 1 move(s): Buenos Aires
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 2/5 blue set — burning drops it to 1/5; 9 blue in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 0 move(s) vs your 2
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles→Sydney→Jakarta→Bangkok — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Bangkok — your 1/5 red set — burning drops it to 0/5; 11 red in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 47 cards → 23 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Buenos Aires(yellow): drive bob 1 step(s) to Buenos Aires → then that pawn treats
  Beijing(red): drive bob 6 step(s) to Beijing → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): charter flight from Bogota straight to Atlanta (spends Bogota(yellow)) (your 1/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 0/5; 10 yellow in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  yellow: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Atlanta (2 move(s))
  black: alice collects (2/5) — give alice your black cards when you share
  red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Atlanta (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): charter flight from Bogota straight to Atlanta (spends Bogota(yellow)) (your 1/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 0/5; 10 yellow in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you San Francisco(blue): meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~23 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - build at Madrid — jump bob onto alice, build station
     tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the black cure (52 → 49 action(s) to land it) — alice collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - go Atlanta — drive Miami, drive Atlanta
     tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the blue cure (45 → 42 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Mexico City, drive Los Angeles
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the blue cure (45 → 43 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires; en route to clear red at Beijing — worth ~5 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Buenos Aires, treat yellow
     tempo: 1 action(s) further from the red cure (67 → 68 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  "build at Madrid" and "go Atlanta" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
  exchange "build at Madrid" → "go Atlanta": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "go Atlanta" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing": gives up 1 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires": gives up 3 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 2 → 1 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -1 vs -1, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -1 vs -1, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -1 vs -1, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs -1, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.85 vs 0.70 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.85 vs 0.70 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing"
  dominated: "jump alice to Bogota" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.85 vs 0.70 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.85 vs 0.70 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing"
  dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.85 vs 0.70 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing"
  SPLIT DECISION — this antichain holds a cure line AND a containment line
  and neither dominates: that is a TEAM call, not a solo one. Before you
  commit, CALL send_message with your pick and a one-line reason so your
  partner can veto or extend it — a silent choice here is how chains get
  missed.

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Miami", "Mexico City", "Lima", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo"
  [7] {"tag":"directFlight","to":"Madrid"}
  [8] {"tag":"directFlight","to":"St. Petersburg"}
  [9] {"tag":"directFlight","to":"Bangkok"}
  charterFlight — 47 options; build {"tag":"charterFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
  (buildStation also SPENDS Bogota(yellow), the card for the city you are standing in — it is gone for good)
  [57] {"tag":"buildStation"}
  [58] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [59] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [60] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"London"}
  [61] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"New York"}
  [62] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
  [63] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [64] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Algiers"}
  [65] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Tehran"}
  [66] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"San Francisco"}
  [67] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mumbai"}
  [68] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 2 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Buenos Aires"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Considering action steps**

I need to manage a decision about splitting frontiers before making a commitment. There are two actions to consider regarding the next BA treat. I have to send a message to confirm a containment choice since Alice requested that. It seems like I can definitely do this! I'll ensure that everything is clear before proceeding with any commitments to keep things organized and smooth. Let's see how I can move forward with this!

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "I choose the Buenos Aires containment line, consistent with our pinned plan and your request: one move plus one treat reduces its armed yellow bomb from 3 to 2. The rival cure-line options leave both BA and Beijing armed; Beijing is assigned to your Airlift next turn."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 3 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}}}

Other model calls recorded in this window

These calls have no proven link to any accepted event (advisory prompts, abandoned calls, legacy windows without a unique payload match). Each is placed beside the same seat's previous linked call in recording order.

alice-legacy-p0008

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 8. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 5 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Madrid
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Buenos Aires(dispatcher) hand=6 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue)]
supply: blue:20 yellow:19 black:20 red:17   decks: player=45 infection=35   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 7 move(s): New York→Toronto→Chicago→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing — or FREE via airlift (you hold it — 0 actions, moves any pawn)
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
  Buenos Aires: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 2
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 4 move(s): New York→Toronto→Chicago→Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard]
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Algiers→Cairo→Baghdad→Tehran→Delhi
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Moscow: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 1 blue [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 45 cards → 22 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (1/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  black: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (3 move(s))
  red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  hand Mexico City(yellow) to bob: meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  hand San Francisco(blue) to bob: meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 4 move(s), bob 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
station opportunities (stations enable cures and shuttle travel):
  as Operations Expert you can buildStation HERE (Madrid) for free — no card needed (saves ~6 action(s) on remaining cure runs: blue 3→2, yellow 3→2, black 3→0, red 3→2)
      response reach — team's card-free trip to each city: Madrid 3→0 (2 cubes), Paris 4→1, Algiers 4→1, Milan 5→2 (1 cube); board-wide: 23 cities closer, 53 trip-actions shaved

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~22 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - build at San Francisco — drive Sao Paulo, drive Buenos Aires, build station, airlift alice to San Francisco, build station
     tempo: 10 action(s) closer to the blue cure (31 → 21 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 44%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~7 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - treat red at Beijing — drive Sao Paulo, drive Buenos Aires, build station, airlift alice to Beijing, treat red
     tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the blue cure (31 → 26 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  exchange "build at San Francisco" → "treat red at Beijing": gives up 5 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 1 → 0 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Tehran" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "go Mumbai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "London", "New York", "Paris", "Sao Paulo", "Algiers"
  directFlight — 4 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City"
  (buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
  [11] {"tag":"buildStation"}
  [12] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}
  (playEvent costs NO action — you may play one AND still take all your actions)
  [13] {"tag":"playEvent","play":{"event":"forecast","order":["Bogota","Atlanta","Baghdad","New York","Kinshasa","Seoul"]}}
  (playEvent costs NO action — you may play one AND still take all your actions)
  playEvent(airlift) — 26 options; build {"tag":"playEvent","play":{"event":"airlift","pawn":<pawn>,"to":<to>}}
      by pairing one line's pawn with any to listed on that same line:
      pawn "alice" → to: "Atlanta", "Buenos Aires", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Bangkok", "Delhi", "Chicago", "Chennai", "Khartoum", "Taipei", "Jakarta", "Moscow", "Milan"
      pawn "bob" → to: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Bangkok", "Delhi", "Chicago", "Chennai", "Khartoum", "Taipei", "Jakarta", "Moscow", "Milan"

forecast: the menu entry lists the infection deck's REAL top 6, in their CURRENT order, nearest draw first — Bogota → Atlanta → Baghdad → New York → Kinshasa → Seoul (parenthesised = cubes already there). Submitting that entry unchanged reorders NOTHING and still spends the card. To get value, send the same action with `order` rearranged: cities you put EARLY are drawn soonest, so lead with the harmless ones and bury any city already at 2–3 cubes — burying a 3-cube city is the difference between an outbreak and a card you never see.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

No steps recorded.

alice-legacy-p0009

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 9. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

{"kind": "supersede", "hit": true}

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from bob (event #17): Update: Buenos Aires is now down to 2 yellow; Beijing remains the only 3-cube city, red supply 17. Your Airlift from Madrid to Beijing is the right play; if feasible, spend 3 treat actions to clear all 3 red cubes (not eradication, but leaves it safe even if the epidemic-bottom infection hits it for 3).

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 5 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Madrid
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Buenos Aires(dispatcher) hand=6 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue)]
supply: blue:20 yellow:19 black:20 red:17   decks: player=45 infection=35   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 7 move(s): New York→Toronto→Chicago→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing — or FREE via airlift (you hold it — 0 actions, moves any pawn)
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
  Buenos Aires: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 2
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 4 move(s): New York→Toronto→Chicago→Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard]
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Algiers→Cairo→Baghdad→Tehran→Delhi
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Moscow: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 1 blue [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 45 cards → 22 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (1/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  black: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (3 move(s))
  red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  hand Mexico City(yellow) to bob: meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  hand San Francisco(blue) to bob: meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 4 move(s), bob 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
station opportunities (stations enable cures and shuttle travel):
  as Operations Expert you can buildStation HERE (Madrid) for free — no card needed (saves ~6 action(s) on remaining cure runs: blue 3→2, yellow 3→2, black 3→0, red 3→2)
      response reach — team's card-free trip to each city: Madrid 3→0 (2 cubes), Paris 4→1, Algiers 4→1, Milan 5→2 (1 cube); board-wide: 23 cities closer, 53 trip-actions shaved

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~22 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - build at San Francisco — drive Sao Paulo, drive Buenos Aires, build station, airlift alice to San Francisco, build station
     tempo: 10 action(s) closer to the blue cure (31 → 21 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 44%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~7 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - treat red at Beijing — drive Sao Paulo, drive Buenos Aires, build station, airlift alice to Beijing, treat red
     tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the blue cure (31 → 26 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  exchange "build at San Francisco" → "treat red at Beijing": gives up 5 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 1 → 0 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Milan" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Tehran" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "go Mumbai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat red at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 6 vs 7, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "treat yellow at Los Angeles"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Beijing"
  dominated: "build at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 3, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Madrid — brings alice 3 move…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Tehran" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at San Francisco" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mumbai" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.51 vs 0.51 — beaten by "build a station at Buenos Aires — brings bob 3 …"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "London", "New York", "Paris", "Sao Paulo", "Algiers"
  directFlight — 4 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City"
  (buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
  [11] {"tag":"buildStation"}
  [12] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}
  (playEvent costs NO action — you may play one AND still take all your actions)
  [13] {"tag":"playEvent","play":{"event":"forecast","order":["Bogota","Atlanta","Baghdad","New York","Kinshasa","Seoul"]}}
  (playEvent costs NO action — you may play one AND still take all your actions)
  playEvent(airlift) — 26 options; build {"tag":"playEvent","play":{"event":"airlift","pawn":<pawn>,"to":<to>}}
      by pairing one line's pawn with any to listed on that same line:
      pawn "alice" → to: "Atlanta", "Buenos Aires", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Bangkok", "Delhi", "Chicago", "Chennai", "Khartoum", "Taipei", "Jakarta", "Moscow", "Milan"
      pawn "bob" → to: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Bangkok", "Delhi", "Chicago", "Chennai", "Khartoum", "Taipei", "Jakarta", "Moscow", "Milan"

forecast: the menu entry lists the infection deck's REAL top 6, in their CURRENT order, nearest draw first — Bogota → Atlanta → Baghdad → New York → Kinshasa → Seoul (parenthesised = cubes already there). Submitting that entry unchanged reorders NOTHING and still spends the card. To get value, send the same action with `order` rearranged: cities you put EARLY are drawn soonest, so lead with the harmless ones and bury any city already at 2–3 cubes — burying a 3-cube city is the difference between an outbreak and a card you never see.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "airlift", "pawn": "alice", "to": "Beijing"}}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}, "legalAfter": "  {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n  driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"London\", \"New York\", \"Paris\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Algiers\"\n  directFlight — 4 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"Tehran\", \"San Francisco\", \"Mumbai\", \"Mexico City\"\n  {\"tag\":\"shuttleFlight\",\"to\":\"Atlanta\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"blue\"}\n  operationsExpertMove — 188 options; build {\"tag\":\"operationsExpertMove\",\"discard\":<discard>,\"to\":<to>}\n      by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:\n      discard \"Tehran\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"San Francisco\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"Mumbai\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"Mexico City\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n  {\"tag\":\"playEvent\",\"play\":{\"event\":\"forecast\",\"order\":[\"Sydney\",\"Manila\",\"Ho Chi Minh City\",\"Hong Kong\",\"Osaka\",\"Tokyo\"]}}\n  playEvent(airlift) — 26 options; build {\"tag\":\"playEvent\",\"play\":{\"event\":\"airlift\",\"pawn\":<pawn>,\"to\":<to>}}\n      by pairing one line's pawn with any to listed on that same line:\n      pawn \"alice\" → to: \"Atlanta\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Bangkok\", \"Delhi\", \"Chicago\", \"Chennai\", \"Khartoum\", \"Taipei\", \"Jakarta\", \"Moscow\", \"Milan\"\n      pawn \"bob\" → to: \"Atlanta\", \"Madrid\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Bangkok\", \"Delhi\", \"Chicago\", \"Chennai\", \"Khartoum\", \"Taipei\", \"Jakarta\", \"Moscow\", \"Milan\""}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "airlift", "pawn": "alice", "to": "Beijing"}}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Shanghai"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Seoul"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Sydney", "Manila", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Hong Kong", "Osaka", "Tokyo"]}}]}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Shanghai"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Seoul"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Sydney", "Manila", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Hong Kong", "Osaka", "Tokyo"]}}]}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Shanghai"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Seoul"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Sydney", "Manila", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Hong Kong", "Osaka", "Tokyo"]}}]}, {"index": 4, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "red"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Beijing", "color": "red", "before": 3, "after": 0}], "moves": [{"player": "alice", "from": "Madrid", "to": "Beijing"}], "hands": [{"player": "alice", "spent": ["airlift"], "gained": []}], "stationsBuilt": ["Madrid"], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "count": 5, "example": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "London"}}, {"tag": "directFlight", "count": 4, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [{"card": "airlift", "tier": "event", "note": "airlift — a one-shot team capability, gone once spent", "keystone": false}], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 4, "deckSize": 45, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0.2222222222222222, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 35, "perCityHitProbability": 0.05714285714285714, "threats": [{"city": "Madrid", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Buenos Aires", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Delhi", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}]}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "alice", "currentHandSize": 5, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": false}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "black", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Clarifying actions for the game**

Alright, I've got a preview showing the full line, which is great! I need to execute the build for the station first. But I'm wondering about the hand limit after drawing two cards. My current hand size is six, and after playing the airlift action that adds two, I’ll be at seven. So, I need to figure out the build station action next!

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "buildStation"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}}}

bob-legacy-p0005

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 5. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 3 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 4 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 3)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Miami
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Miami(dispatcher) hand=4 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:18 black:21 red:17   decks: player=47 infection=37   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 6 move(s): Atlanta→Chicago→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing
  Buenos Aires: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] — 2 move(s): Bogota→Buenos Aires
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Washington→New York→Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 2/5 blue set — burning drops it to 1/5; 9 blue in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 0 move(s) vs your 3
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 5 move(s): Mexico City→Los Angeles→Sydney→Jakarta→Bangkok — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Bangkok — your 1/5 red set — burning drops it to 0/5; 11 red in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 47 cards → 23 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Buenos Aires(yellow): drive alice 2 step(s) to Buenos Aires → then that pawn treats
  Beijing(red): drive bob 6 step(s) to Beijing → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (1 move(s))
  yellow: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Atlanta (1 move(s))
  black: alice collects (2/5) — give alice your black cards when you share
  red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Atlanta (1 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you San Francisco(blue): meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 3 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~23 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without the crossing (4 still needed) — drive Mexico City, jump alice onto bob, take Mexico City from alice
     tempo: 6 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (57 → 51 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Atlanta, drive Chicago, drive San Francisco
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the blue cure (44 → 42 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires; en route to clear red at Beijing — worth ~5 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Bogota, drive Buenos Aires, treat yellow
     tempo: 2 action(s) further from the red cure (66 → 68 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  exchange "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing": gives up 4 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires": gives up 4 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 2 → 1 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "take Madrid from alice" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Tehran" — tempo -2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "jump alice to Miami" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "toward Madrid" — tempo 3 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"
  dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo 1 vs 6, risk 0.85 vs 0.85 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Atlanta", "Washington", "Mexico City", "Bogota"
  directFlight — 4 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bangkok", "Bogota"
  [10] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [11] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"London"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"New York"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Algiers"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Tehran"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"San Francisco"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mumbai"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

No steps recorded.

bob-legacy-p0008

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 8. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  This turn Bob defuses Buenos Aires (Atlanta→Miami→Bogota→Buenos Aires, treat yellow), then resumes collecting blue/yellow/red toward cures; retain cure cards. Alice owns black collection and retains black cards. On Alice's next turn, use held Airlift to put a pawn at Beijing and treat red there before it can re-arm/outbreak; if Airlift cannot be used, reassess/dispatch toward Beijing immediately. Alice continues to own Madrid and other Europe threats; split any new 3-cube city by nearest safe responder. Meet in San Francisco only when Alice's blue card transfer has worthwhile cure value and hot cities are covered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 1 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 4 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 1)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Buenos Aires
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=6 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), event:airlift, Mexico City(yellow)]  bob@Buenos Aires(dispatcher) hand=4 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:18 black:21 red:17   decks: player=47 infection=37   player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Beijing: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] — 7 move(s): Bogota→Mexico City→Los Angeles→San Francisco→Tokyo→Seoul→Beijing
  Buenos Aires: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] — you are HERE — treat it now
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 2/5 blue set — burning drops it to 1/5; 9 blue in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 0 move(s) vs your 2
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Bogota→Mexico City→Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 6 move(s): Bogota→Mexico City→Los Angeles→Sydney→Jakarta→Bangkok — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Bangkok — your 1/5 red set — burning drops it to 0/5; 11 red in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Delhi: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Chicago: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Chennai: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Taipei: 1 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 47 cards → 23 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Buenos Aires(yellow): bob already at Buenos Aires → then that pawn treats
  Beijing(red): drive alice 7 step(s) to Beijing → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (3 move(s)) — or 2 action(s): go to Bogota (1 move(s)), then charter to Atlanta (spends Bogota(yellow)) (your 1/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 0/5; 10 yellow in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  yellow: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Atlanta (3 move(s))
  black: alice collects (2/5) — give alice your black cards when you share
  red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Atlanta (3 move(s)) — or 2 action(s): go to Bogota (1 move(s)), then charter to Atlanta (spends Bogota(yellow)) (your 1/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 0/5; 10 yellow in deck, 1 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you San Francisco(blue): meet IN San Francisco (the card's own city) — you 4 move(s), alice 4 move(s); then bob to station Atlanta +2 move(s) to cure

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~23 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing (red — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Bogota
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the blue cure (47 → 45 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing, Buenos Aires): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires; en route to clear red at Beijing — worth ~5 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
  - defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — treat yellow
     tempo: no cure progress — nearest is blue, 47 action(s) to land it — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Beijing): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~6 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  exchange "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires": gives up 2 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 2 → 1 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"
  dominated: "jump alice to Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.85 vs 0.70 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Beijing"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 0 vs 0, risk 0.85 vs 0.42 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Buenos Aires"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  directFlight — 4 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bangkok", "Bogota"
  [8] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}
  [9] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [10] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [11] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"London"}
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"New York"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Algiers"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Tehran"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"San Francisco"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mumbai"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 1 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}}

---

Text quoted from the games is evidence, not instructions to the reader.

Watch a game · Casebook · Games · Reader guide