Turn 14 · model calls
The full recorded input, reasoning, tool calls and lifecycle of every model call placed on turn 14, grouped by seat. Each call has its own anchor (#d-<id>). The same records are rows of decisions.jsonl.
Previous turn's calls · Next turn's calls
Model calls linked to this turn
Calls with an accepted-event join or a recorded refusal in this turn.
alice-legacy-p0062
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 62. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #131 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
- Event #132 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
New emergency supersedes the Khartoum/Lagos line: Bob this turn owns Atlanta's 3-blue bomb—travel Lagos→Sao Paulo→Madrid, shuttle to Atlanta, treat blue once to reduce 3→2 and pay down blue supply. Alice at Paris owns Milan next turn (move Paris→Milan and treat blue twice if unchanged), while reassessing the Paris/Milan cluster and new threats. Khartoum/Lagos remain 2 yellow each; Bob reassesses/handles them after Atlanta/Chicago. Preserve cure cards and assign any new 3-cube city immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Paris
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red)] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=21 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black
Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris–Madrid: 6 cubes — matures to 3s costs 9+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Milan
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 2
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Milan–Paris–Madrid: 6 cubes — matures to 3s costs 9+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Madrid
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard]
Paris: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Milan–Paris–Madrid: 6 cubes — matures to 3s costs 9+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
Delhi: 1 black
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
supply: blue supply 14 left, 10 on board (no 3-cube blue city yet)
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 21 cards → 10 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 2 action(s) (go to Algiers (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Essen→St. Petersburg→Moscow
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~10 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- build at Tokyo (move Atlanta) — drive Madrid, treat blue, operationsExpertMove, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 55 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- build at Tokyo (move Atlanta) — treat blue, drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 55 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- build at Tokyo (move Madrid) — build station, operationsExpertMove, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 55 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- build at Tokyo (move Madrid) — drive Milan, build station, operationsExpertMove, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 55 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"build at Tokyo", "build at Tokyo", "build at Tokyo", "build at Tokyo" tie exactly on both axes; ordered by cubes cleared (1, 1, 0, 0), which neither axis prices.
exchange "build at Tokyo" → "build at Tokyo": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "build at Tokyo" → "build at Tokyo": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "build at Tokyo" → "build at Tokyo": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Paris" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -3 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Madrid)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Beijing (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Los Angeles (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Delhi (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Buenos Aires (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -3 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Madrid)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Beijing (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Los Angeles (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Delhi (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Buenos Aires (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Madrid)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster at Pa…"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "London", "Madrid", "Essen", "Milan", "Algiers"
directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata", "Santiago", "Shanghai"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
[20] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Evaluating actions in the game**
I'm considering actions related to the blue cubes in Paris and Madrid. Reducing the blue in Paris seems essential, dropping from 2 to 1. That's one action to pay down the blue supply, but to clear it completely, I might need two actions. However, I've got four actions available. The key decision would be whether to resolve the blue cubes in Madrid with one drive, which could require a different strategy to manage the cubes effectively.**Analyzing city clusters**
I’m looking at the blue cluster of six cubes across Milan, Paris, and Madrid. The immediate action seems to be reducing either Paris or Milan since they are closely connected. Paris connects to both Milan and Madrid, but each city currently only has two connections. If an epidemic reshuffle happens and all three cities are re-added, they could reconnect as a chain. So, it looks like I need to reduce a city to one or none.text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "The Paris/Milan/Madrid blue cluster is now 6 cubes (2 each) and Paris is already in the infection discard; blue supply is 14. I’ll prioritize treating Paris to zero, then move to Milan and treat once (1), spending all 4 actions. Please own the Chicago–Atlanta pair next turn, and we can use your Los Angeles yellow card to complete my 4/5 yellow cure once the cluster is stable."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}
{"tool": "pin_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately."}, "output": {"pinned": true, "note": "This replaces the standing team plan; both players will see it every turn until superseded. You have sent 2 of 5 messages available this turn."}}Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Milan"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"Algiers\"\n directFlight — 7 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Mexico City\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Lima\", \"Algiers\", \"Kolkata\", \"Santiago\", \"Shanghai\"\n buildStation — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"buildStation\",\"relocateFrom\":<one relocateFrom below>}\n relocateFrom: \"Atlanta\", \"Madrid\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Delhi\", \"Buenos Aires\"\n {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"blue\"}"}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"Algiers\"\n directFlight — 7 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Mexico City\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Lima\", \"Algiers\", \"Kolkata\", \"Santiago\", \"Shanghai\"\n buildStation — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"buildStation\",\"relocateFrom\":<one relocateFrom below>}\n relocateFrom: \"Atlanta\", \"Madrid\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Delhi\", \"Buenos Aires\""}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Milan"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Essen\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Paris\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Istanbul\"}\n directFlight — 7 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Mexico City\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Lima\", \"Algiers\", \"Kolkata\", \"Santiago\", \"Shanghai\"\n buildStation — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"buildStation\",\"relocateFrom\":<one relocateFrom below>}\n relocateFrom: \"Atlanta\", \"Madrid\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Delhi\", \"Buenos Aires\"\n {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"blue\"}"}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Milan", "color": "blue", "before": 2, "after": 1}, {"city": "Paris", "color": "blue", "before": 2, "after": 0}], "moves": [{"player": "alice", "from": "Paris", "to": "Milan"}], "hands": [], "stationsBuilt": [], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "directFlight", "count": 7, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}}, {"tag": "buildStation", "count": 6, "example": {"tag": "buildStation", "relocateFrom": "Atlanta"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 2, "deckSize": 21, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0.2222222222222222, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 41, "perCityHitProbability": 0.04878048780487805, "threats": [{"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Chicago", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Chennai", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Khartoum", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Taipei", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Jakarta", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Moscow", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.2}, {"city": "Atlanta", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Madrid", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Beijing", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}], "knownTopSegment": {"cities": ["Delhi", "Los Angeles", "Moscow", "Bangkok", "Lagos", "Khartoum", "Milan", "Jakarta", "Chennai", "Chicago"], "unidentified": 0, "size": 10}}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "alice", "currentHandSize": 7, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": true}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 2, "attainable": 10, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 4, "attainable": 8, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 4, "attainable": 8, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}Step 3 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Evaluating card strategy**
I have a solid plan in place, but my current hand limit restricts me to seven cards, requiring me to discard two. I need to preserve my set of four yellow and one red card, while considering the two black cards I have. Discarding the black cards seems wise, since they are already cured, and I need to focus on progressing my red and yellow sets. I plan to treat blue as my first action, and I should also update my teammate about our strategy.text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}}alice-legacy-p0065
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 65. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #136 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
{"kind": "supersede", "hit": true}Recorded input
POOL MESSAGE from bob (event #135): Agreed—I’ll own the Chicago–Atlanta pair next turn after you work Paris/Milan. Please keep the Los Angeles card on my handoff list; once the cluster is stable, I can shuttle from Atlanta to LA station for the yellow share/cure.
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 2)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Paris
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red)] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:16 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=21 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black
Milan: 2 blue — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Milan
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 2
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Madrid
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Beijing — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Delhi: 1 black
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 21 cards → 10 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 2 action(s) (go to Algiers (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Essen→St. Petersburg→Moscow
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~10 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- go Los Angeles — drive Madrid, shuttle Los Angeles
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (8 → 5 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Beijing — drive Madrid, shuttle Beijing
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 57 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Shanghai — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 57 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Tokyo — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 57 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"go Los Angeles", "go Beijing", "go Shanghai", "go Tokyo" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "go Los Angeles" → "go Beijing": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "go Beijing" → "go Shanghai": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "go Shanghai" → "go Tokyo": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "break the Bangkok–Jakarta red cluster at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Santiago" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go London" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "London", "Madrid", "Essen", "Milan", "Algiers"
directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata", "Santiago", "Shanghai"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 2 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Milan"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Executing plans for Milan**
I'm noting that Paris is cleared up; next up is Milan, where I have two actions left. I need to drive to Milan and then treat blue once as a preview. It feels like progress is happening here! So, I'll submit the drive to Milan, making sure everything is set up smoothly before proceeding. I want to get this just right!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Milan"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Milan"}}}alice-legacy-p0067
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 67. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #138 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=awaitingDiscard turnOwner=alice (alice must discard to 7)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Milan
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Milan(operationsExpert) hand=9 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red), Cairo(black), event:oneQuietNight] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=19 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Paris→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 3
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Istanbul→Cairo→Khartoum — or 2 action(s): direct flight to Cairo (spends Cairo(black)), then 1 move(s) to Khartoum
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Istanbul→Moscow [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Paris→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 3
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Paris→Madrid — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard]
Delhi: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 19 cards → 9 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card when you CAN, but a shed is forced now; the ranking below advises, it does not decide; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card when you CAN, but a shed is forced now; the ranking below advises, it does not decide; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s))
discard hint: red: no spare right now (every held card counts toward that cure — ranked below like every other card); yellow: 1 spare — shedding 1 keeps the cure assemblable; safest first: Algiers (black CURED — worthless, discard freely) [claimed: a containment route above flies on this card to reach Chicago], Kolkata (black CURED — worthless, discard freely) [claimed: a containment route above flies on this card to reach Bangkok], Cairo (black CURED — worthless, discard freely) [claimed: a containment route above flies on this card to reach Khartoum], Mexico City (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Kinshasa (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Lima (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Santiago (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Shanghai (red: short — 2/5 held team-wide, no spare yet; margin 3, 4/12 burned, alice collects), oneQuietNight (event: skip the next infect phase entirely)
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 9/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 3 action(s) (go to Algiers (2 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 9/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 9/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Mexico City"}}
[1] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Kinshasa"}}
[2] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Lima"}}
[3] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Algiers"}}
[4] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Kolkata"}}
[5] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Santiago"}}
[6] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Shanghai"}}
[7] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Cairo"}}
[8] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"event","event":"oneQuietNight"}}Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "discard", "card": {"kind": "city", "city": "Algiers"}}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "discard", "card": {"kind": "city", "city": "Algiers"}}}}alice-legacy-p0068
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 68. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #139 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=awaitingDiscard turnOwner=alice (alice must discard to 7)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Milan
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Milan(operationsExpert) hand=8 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red), Cairo(black), event:oneQuietNight] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=19 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 7 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Paris→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 3
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Istanbul→Cairo→Khartoum — or 2 action(s): direct flight to Cairo (spends Cairo(black)), then 1 move(s) to Khartoum
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Istanbul→Moscow [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Paris→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 3
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Paris→Madrid — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard]
Delhi: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 19 cards → 9 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card when you CAN, but a shed is forced now; the ranking below advises, it does not decide; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card when you CAN, but a shed is forced now; the ranking below advises, it does not decide; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s))
discard hint: red: no spare right now (every held card counts toward that cure — ranked below like every other card); yellow: 1 spare — shedding 1 keeps the cure assemblable; safest first: Kolkata (black CURED — worthless, discard freely) [claimed: a containment route above flies on this card to reach Bangkok], Cairo (black CURED — worthless, discard freely) [claimed: a containment route above flies on this card to reach Chicago], Mexico City (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Kinshasa (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Lima (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Santiago (yellow: 1 spare from YOUR 4 (6 held team-wide, need 5) — shedding keeps the cure assemblable), Shanghai (red: short — 2/5 held team-wide, no spare yet; margin 3, 4/12 burned, alice collects), oneQuietNight (event: skip the next infect phase entirely)
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 8/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 3 action(s) (go to Cairo (2 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Cairo(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Beijing +2 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 8/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 8/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Mexico City"}}
[1] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Kinshasa"}}
[2] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Lima"}}
[3] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Kolkata"}}
[4] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Santiago"}}
[5] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Shanghai"}}
[6] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"city","city":"Cairo"}}
[7] {"tag":"discard","card":{"kind":"event","event":"oneQuietNight"}}Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "discard", "card": {"kind": "city", "city": "Kolkata"}}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "discard", "card": {"kind": "city", "city": "Kolkata"}}}}bob-legacy-p0065
Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 65. Active turn: False.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #135 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
POOL MESSAGE from alice (event #131): The Paris/Milan/Madrid blue cluster is now 6 cubes (2 each) and Paris is already in the infection discard; blue supply is 14. I’ll prioritize treating Paris to zero, then move to Milan and treat once (1), spending all 4 actions. Please own the Chicago–Atlanta pair next turn, and we can use your Los Angeles yellow card to complete my 4/5 yellow cure once the cluster is stable.
Reply via send_message only if it helps; otherwise continue or stop.Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Considering cluster strategy**
I’m analyzing the strategy for managing cities like Chicago and Atlanta. Both have infection risks, so I wonder which is better for our cluster. If I discard Atlanta but keep Chicago, it’ll help with future reshuffles. I think the plan is for Bob to cover the cluster next turn, while Alice moves to Paris or Milan. I agree it’s a good approach to prioritize removing infection cubes and sharing cards effectively, especially with Bob’s yellow cards in play. It seems to be a solid plan!**Planning card sharing strategy**
Okay, I've got the Los Angeles card with Bob, which is key for sharing and curing. We need to rendezvous in LA, but Alice can't reach the station directly from Milan. If she moves to Paris and then Madrid, she can shuttle to LA with three actions. Ideally, Bob should wait for Alice there. He can clear yellow cubes in LA afterward, but we need to save some actions for that. The blue cluster in Atlanta and Chicago is also a concern!**Prioritizing blue cluster management**
It makes sense for Bob to focus on the blue cluster rather than preparing for yellow, especially since he already has four yellow cubes. Alice has a good number, too, so once she gets a transfer, she could finish her set. With only ten turns left, we need to cure soon, but we also have fires to address. If Alice clears cities like Paris and Milan, Bob can focus on Chicago and Atlanta. This helps us buy time for future actions! Plus, we need to keep an eye on the supply levels.text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Agreed—I’ll own the Chicago–Atlanta pair next turn after you work Paris/Milan. Please keep the Los Angeles card on my handoff list; once the cluster is stable, I can shuttle from Atlanta to LA station for the yellow share/cure."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text:
I confirmed I’ll handle the Chicago–Atlanta pair next turn and keep my Los Angeles card for a later yellow handoff at the station.toolCalls: []
Other model calls recorded in this window
These calls have no proven link to any accepted event (advisory prompts, abandoned calls, legacy windows without a unique payload match). Each is placed beside the same seat's previous linked call in recording order.
alice-legacy-p0063
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 63. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 3)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Paris
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red)] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:15 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=21 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black
Milan: 2 blue — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Milan
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 2
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Madrid
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Beijing — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Delhi: 1 black
Paris: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 21 cards → 10 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 2 action(s) (go to Algiers (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Essen→St. Petersburg→Moscow
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~10 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- build at Tokyo (move Madrid) — build station, operationsExpertMove, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 55 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- build at Tokyo (move Atlanta) — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 55 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"build at Tokyo" and "build at Tokyo" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "build at Tokyo" → "build at Tokyo": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "break the Bangkok–Jakarta red cluster at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Madrid)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Beijing (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Los Angeles (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Delhi (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Buenos Aires (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Santiago" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Santiago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Shanghai" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "build at Shanghai (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Tokyo"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go London" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Tokyo" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Shanghai"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "London", "Madrid", "Essen", "Milan", "Algiers"
directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata", "Santiago", "Shanghai"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
[20] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Organizing tasks**
I need to sort out my actions: first, I should plan to treat blue again. Then, driving to Milan comes next, and finally, I’ll treat blue once more. It seems I need to focus on completing the second action, which is the drive to Milan. Alright, let’s make sure I don’t mix these up! Each step matters, so I have to stay organized. It's all about getting these tasks done efficiently!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}}alice-legacy-p0064
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 64. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 2)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Paris
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red)] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:16 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=21 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black
Milan: 2 blue — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Milan
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 0 move(s) vs your 2
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Madrid
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Beijing — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Delhi: 1 black
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 21 cards → 10 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 2 action(s) (go to Algiers (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Essen→St. Petersburg→Moscow
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~10 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- go Los Angeles — drive Madrid, shuttle Los Angeles
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (8 → 5 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Beijing — drive Madrid, shuttle Beijing
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 57 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Shanghai — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 57 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Tokyo — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the red cure (60 → 57 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"go Los Angeles", "go Beijing", "go Shanghai", "go Tokyo" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "go Los Angeles" → "go Beijing": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "go Beijing" → "go Shanghai": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "go Shanghai" → "go Tokyo": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "break the Bangkok–Jakarta red cluster at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Santiago" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go London" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "London", "Madrid", "Essen", "Milan", "Algiers"
directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata", "Santiago", "Shanghai"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 2 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Milan"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
No steps recorded.
alice-legacy-p0066
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 66. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 1)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Milan
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Milan(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red)] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:16 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=21 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Paris→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 3
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Istanbul→Cairo→Khartoum
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Istanbul→Moscow [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
Milan: 2 blue — pre-empt (one draw from critical): you are HERE — treat it now
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Paris→Madrid — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard]
Delhi: 1 black
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 21 cards → 10 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s))
red: YOU collect (1/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s))
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
bob hands you Los Angeles(yellow): meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 1 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
bob hands you Tokyo(red): meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 3 action(s) (go to Algiers (2 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))), bob 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
bob hands you Sao Paulo(yellow): meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
Moscow (black, 2): 3 action(s) total = 2 move(s) + 1 treat: Istanbul→Moscow
Chennai (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Paris→Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 4
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
- build at Milan (move Atlanta) — build station
tempo: 4 action(s) closer to the red cure (62 → 58 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
dominated: break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Milan".
dominated: sweep Moscow (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all) — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
dominated: treat blue at Milan — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
dominated: toward St. Petersburg — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
[2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Essen"}
[3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
[4] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Istanbul"}
directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata", "Santiago", "Shanghai"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
[18] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 1 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}}bob-legacy-p0066
Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 66. Active turn: False.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ADVISORY — alice is on the move; you cannot act.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
=== STATE ===
phase=awaitingDiscard turnOwner=alice (alice must discard to 7)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Atlanta
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Milan(operationsExpert) hand=9 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red), Cairo(black), event:oneQuietNight] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:16 decks: player=19 infection=41 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — yellow margin 3 — burnable; 2 yellow still in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Chicago
Chennai: 2 black
Khartoum: 2 yellow
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 4/5 blue set — burning drops it to 3/5; 6 blue in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Beijing
Delhi: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 19 cards → 9 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (0 move(s))
yellow: alice collects (4/5) — give alice your yellow cards when you share
red: alice collects (1/5) — give alice your red cards when you share
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
hand Los Angeles(yellow) to alice: meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 3 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 9/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
hand Tokyo(red) to alice: meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))), alice 3 action(s) (go to Algiers (2 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Algiers(black))); then alice to station Madrid +2 action(s) (direct flight to Algiers (spends Algiers(black)), then 1 move(s) to Madrid) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 9/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
hand Sao Paulo(yellow) to alice: meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 9/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
If you have useful advice for the active player, CALL the send_message
tool — advice written as plain text is discarded, never delivered.
If you have nothing useful to add, just stop.Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
No steps recorded.
bob-legacy-p0067
Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 67. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
Alice at Paris owns the Milan–Paris–Madrid blue cluster this turn: treat Paris twice to clear it, then move to Milan and treat once (2→1), paying down blue supply without burning cure cards. Bob at Atlanta owns Chicago–Atlanta blue next turn (clear Atlanta/Chicago as actions allow); Bob keeps blue 4/5. Yellow: Alice has 4/5 and Bob holds Los Angeles yellow as the fifth; arrange a named LA rendezvous/share and cure at LA after urgent blue clusters are controlled (Alice must shed a non-yellow card at hand cap). Bob owns the Bangkok–Jakarta red pair and K/L yellow cluster after blue response; Alice collects red only from new draws. Reassign any new 3-cube city/supply warning immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
⚠ PLAN COVERAGE: this plan says nothing about Chennai (3 black) — 3-cube city that matured after (or
were left out of) the pin. Fold one into your route, say who takes it,
or re-pin.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 9 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Atlanta
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Milan(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red), Cairo(black), event:oneQuietNight] bob@Atlanta(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Tokyo(red), Sao Paulo(yellow)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:18 red:15 decks: player=19 infection=39 player-discard: 2 blue, 4 yellow, 8 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Bangkok: 3 red⚠ [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — 3 move(s): (shuttle)Delhi→Kolkata→Bangkok — or 2 action(s): go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Bangkok (spends Los Angeles(yellow))
Chennai: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 2 move(s): (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — yellow margin 3 — burnable; 2 yellow still in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Chicago
Khartoum: 2 yellow
Taipei: 2 red
Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
Moscow: 2 black
Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
Beijing: 2 red [in infect-discard]
Delhi: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 19 cards → 9 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 6 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
yellow: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 2, 2 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 1, 6 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
Chennai(black): drive bob 2 step(s) to Chennai → then that pawn treats
Bangkok(red): drive bob 3 step(s) to Bangkok → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Atlanta (0 move(s))
yellow: alice collects (4/5) — give alice your yellow cards when you share
red: alice collects (1/5) — give alice your red cards when you share
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
hand Los Angeles(yellow) to alice: meet IN Los Angeles (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 3 move(s); Los Angeles already has the station — cure on the spot; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
hand Tokyo(red) to alice: meet IN Tokyo (the card's own city) — you 2 action(s) (go to Los Angeles (1 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Los Angeles(yellow))), alice 3 action(s) (go to Cairo (2 move(s)), then charter to Tokyo (spends Cairo(black))); then alice to station Beijing +2 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-red card to shed before committing
hand Sao Paulo(yellow) to alice: meet IN Sao Paulo (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 3 move(s); then alice to station Madrid +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: alice already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing — this transfer completes the set; shed the named card and discoverCure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
Chennai (black, 3, imminent): 3 action(s) total = 2 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Tehran→Moscow — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~9 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- give Tokyo to alice — shuttle Los Angeles, charter to Tokyo, jump alice onto bob, give Tokyo to alice
tempo: 11 action(s) closer to the red cure (62 → 51 action(s) to land it) — alice collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 2 armed discard bomb(s) (Chennai, Bangkok): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 57%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~2 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
- treat black at Chennai — shuttle Los Angeles, treat yellow, charter to Chennai, treat black
tempo: 1 action(s) further from the blue cure (17 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 4 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Bangkok): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 57%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
- treat black at Chennai — treat blue, shuttle Delhi, drive Chennai, treat black
tempo: 1 action(s) further from the blue cure (17 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 4 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Bangkok): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 57%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
- sweep Chennai (black cured, 3 cubes, 1 treat clears all) — shuttle Delhi, drive Chennai, treat black
tempo: 1 action(s) further from the blue cure (17 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 3 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Bangkok): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 57%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
"treat black at Chennai", "treat black at Chennai", "sweep Chennai" tie exactly on both axes; ordered by cubes cleared (4, 4, 3), which neither axis prices.
exchange "give Tokyo to alice" → "treat black at Chennai": gives up 12 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 2 → 1 committed outbreak(s)
exchange "treat black at Chennai" → "treat black at Chennai": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
exchange "treat black at Chennai" → "sweep Chennai": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los Angeles handoff (alice collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff without the crossing (1 still needed)" — tempo 9 vs 11, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "give Tokyo to alice"
dominated: "break the Bangkok–Jakarta red cluster at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 0.76 vs 0.76 — beaten by "sweep Chennai"
dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "give Los Angeles to alice" — tempo 9 vs 11, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "give Tokyo to alice"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 0.76 vs 0.76 — beaten by "sweep Chennai"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Tokyo (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo -9 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 5 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 5 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "jump alice to Atlanta" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Santiago" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Santiago" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Shanghai" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Shanghai" — tempo 7 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Shanghai" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go London" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go London" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go London" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Tokyo" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Tokyo" — tempo 7 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Tokyo" — tempo 7 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 5 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -16 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 5 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "build at Tokyo (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 5 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give Essen to alice" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "give Essen to alice" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo 6 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo 7 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo 7 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Chicago" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Milan" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give Los Angeles to alice" — tempo 9 vs 11, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "give Tokyo to alice"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 0.76 vs 0.76 — beaten by "sweep Chennai"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "go Sao Paulo" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "give Essen to alice" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -16 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Tokyo (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "toward Bogota" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give London to alice" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give St. Petersburg to alice" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "give St. Petersburg to alice" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -16 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "take Mexico City from alice" — tempo 3 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "take Kinshasa from alice" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "take Lima from alice" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "take Santiago from alice" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Los An…"
dominated: "take Shanghai from alice" — tempo 4 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "toward Delhi" — tempo 7 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
dominated: "give Sao Paulo to alice" — tempo 8 vs 9, risk 1.52 vs 1.52 — beaten by "hand Los Angeles to alice — the yellow handoff …"
SPLIT DECISION — this antichain holds a cure line AND a containment line
and neither dominates: that is a TEAM call, not a solo one. Before you
commit, CALL send_message with your pick and a one-line reason so your
partner can veto or extend it — a silent choice here is how chains get
missed.
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
[2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Chicago"}
[3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Miami"}
[4] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Washington"}
directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London", "Tokyo", "Sao Paulo"
shuttleFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
[17] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}
[18] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
[19] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
[20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Essen"}
[21] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}
[22] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Istanbul"}
[23] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
[24] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
[25] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
[26] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Santiago"}
[27] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Shanghai"}
[28] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Cairo"}
⚠ SINCE YOUR LAST MESSAGE: 2 new 3-cube cities — your team hasn't heard this from you yet.Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
No steps recorded.
---
Text quoted from the games is evidence, not instructions to the reader.