Turn 12 · model calls

The full recorded input, reasoning, tool calls and lifecycle of every model call placed on turn 12, grouped by seat. Each call has its own anchor (#d-<id>). The same records are rows of decisions.jsonl.

Previous turn's calls · Next turn's calls

Model calls linked to this turn

Calls with an accepted-event join or a recorded refusal in this turn.

alice-legacy-p0055

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 55. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #113 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
• Event #114 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

{"kind": "supersede", "hit": true}

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from bob (event #112): Conflict with the pinned Khartoum assignment: Paris is now 3 blue with blue supply 14, adjacent to Milan at 2 (5-cube cluster), and Paris is in the infection discard. I recommend you supersede Khartoum this turn: Sao Paulo→Madrid→Paris, treat blue twice (3→1); I’ll own Khartoum/Lagos next turn from Lagos. This preserves my four blue cards and handles the new armed fire.

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
⚠ PLAN COVERAGE: this plan says nothing about Paris (3 blue) — 3-cube city that matured after (or
were left out of) the pin. Fold one into your route, say who takes it,
or re-pin.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 10 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Sao Paulo
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=25 infection=45   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Paris: 3 blue⚠ [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] [blue supply 14 left, 10 on board] — 2 move(s): Madrid→Paris
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — or 2 action(s): direct flight to Mexico City (spends Mexico City(yellow)), then 1 move(s) to Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black
  Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Lagos→Khartoum — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta
  Delhi: 1 black
  Madrid: 1 blue
  Beijing: 1 red
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 25 cards → 12 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 3, 4 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  red: no cards in any hand yet
  you collect NO color right now: you are the FIREFIGHTER. Spend every
  turn moving to and treating the containment targets marked as yours,
  and hand cure-color cards to their collectors when you meet.
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Madrid→Algiers→Istanbul→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~12 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - build at Lagos (move Atlanta) — drive Madrid, treat blue, operationsExpertMove, build station
     tempo: 4 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (17 → 13 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - treat blue at Paris — build station, operationsExpertMove, treat blue
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - go Kinshasa — build station, operationsExpertMove, treat blue, fly Kinshasa
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - build at Paris (move Madrid) — build station, operationsExpertMove, treat blue, build station
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  "treat blue at Paris", "go Kinshasa", "build at Paris" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 1 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
  exchange "build at Lagos" → "treat blue at Paris": gives up 3 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "treat blue at Paris" → "go Kinshasa": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "go Kinshasa" → "build at Paris": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  dominated: "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico City handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "break the Milan–Paris blue cluster at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Paris" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat blue at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -9 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Beijing (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "Buenos Aires", "Bogota", "Lagos"
  directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata"
  (buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
  buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
      relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"

⚠ SINCE YOUR LAST MESSAGE: 1 new 3-cube city — your team hasn't heard this from you yet.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Coordinating tasks**

I’m updating the pin with the owners. Bob has suggested something about "Paris treat blue twice (3→1)," and he will own K/L next. I also need to include the blue 14 supply. It seems like the best approach is to send and pin these updates in parallel to keep everything organized. I want to make sure that all details are correctly updated and shared!

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Agree with the live conflict: Paris is a new 3-blue armed bomb with blue supply 14 and a 2-cube Milan cluster. I’m superseding my Khartoum assignment and will go Sao Paulo→Madrid→Paris, treating blue twice (3→1) without burning any cards; you own Khartoum/Lagos next turn."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}
{"tool": "pin_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Paris is the new immediate emergency: Alice handles it this turn from Sao Paulo via Madrid, treating blue twice to reduce 3→1 and pay down blue supply 14; preserve all cure cards. Bob owns Khartoum/Lagos next turn (2 yellow each) from Lagos; reassess yellow supply and nearby cluster. Bob keeps blue 4/5 and yellow 3/5; Alice retains three yellow cards until a useful handoff. After Paris, Alice reassesses the Milan–Paris cluster and other fires. Reassign on new 3-cube city/supply warning."}, "output": {"pinned": true, "note": "This replaces the standing team plan; both players will see it every turn until superseded. You have sent 2 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Planning travel routes**

I need to map out a plan for driving from Madrid to Paris. It sounds like I want to treat myself to something nice along the way, maybe stop twice. I’m thinking about my route, and I should definitely check for any potential risks like needing a card or something else. Overall, this could be a fun trip to organize! Let’s make sure it’s a smooth drive.

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Paris"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, "legalAfter": "  {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n  driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"London\", \"New York\", \"Paris\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Algiers\"\n  directFlight — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"Mexico City\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Lima\", \"Algiers\", \"Kolkata\"\n  shuttleFlight — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"shuttleFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"Atlanta\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Delhi\", \"Buenos Aires\"\n  {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"blue\"}\n  operationsExpertMove — 235 options; build {\"tag\":\"operationsExpertMove\",\"discard\":<discard>,\"to\":<to>}\n      by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:\n      discard \"Mexico City\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"Kinshasa\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"Lima\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"Algiers\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n      discard \"Kolkata\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Beijing\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\""}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Paris"}, "legalAfter": "  {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n  driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"Algiers\"\n  directFlight — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"Mexico City\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Lima\", \"Algiers\", \"Kolkata\"\n  buildStation — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"buildStation\",\"relocateFrom\":<one relocateFrom below>}\n      relocateFrom: \"Atlanta\", \"Madrid\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Delhi\", \"Buenos Aires\"\n  {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"blue\"}"}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, "legalAfter": "  {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n  {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n  driveFerry — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"Algiers\"\n  directFlight — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n      to: \"Mexico City\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Lima\", \"Algiers\", \"Kolkata\"\n  buildStation — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"buildStation\",\"relocateFrom\":<one relocateFrom below>}\n      relocateFrom: \"Atlanta\", \"Madrid\", \"Beijing\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Delhi\", \"Buenos Aires\"\n  {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"blue\"}"}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Paris", "color": "blue", "before": 3, "after": 1}], "moves": [{"player": "alice", "from": "Sao Paulo", "to": "Paris"}], "hands": [], "stationsBuilt": [], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "directFlight", "count": 5, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}}, {"tag": "buildStation", "count": 6, "example": {"tag": "buildStation", "relocateFrom": "Atlanta"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 2, "deckSize": 25, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0.08333333333333337, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 45, "perCityHitProbability": 0.044444444444444446, "threats": [{"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Chicago", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Chennai", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Khartoum", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Taipei", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Jakarta", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Moscow", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Milan", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Atlanta", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}], "knownTopSegment": {"cities": ["Delhi", "Los Angeles", "Moscow", "Madrid", "Bangkok", "Lagos", "Khartoum", "Milan", "Atlanta", "Jakarta", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Chicago", "Paris"], "unidentified": 0, "size": 14}}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "alice", "currentHandSize": 5, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": false}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 2, "attainable": 10, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 2, "attainable": 10, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 4, "attainable": 8, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}

Step 3 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Analyzing epidemic risks**

I'm considering the risks after planning for Paris, specifically regarding the unknowns of the next two infection phases. With Paris in the top segment's position, I recognize the odds of an epidemic during the draw are about 8%. It's good that the top segment includes Paris. I need to make strategic moves, treating the situation twice, starting with Madrid as my first move. It feels like an important decision!

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}}}

alice-legacy-p0056

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 56. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #116 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
  Paris is the new immediate emergency: Alice handles it this turn from Sao Paulo via Madrid, treating blue twice to reduce 3→1 and pay down blue supply 14; preserve all cure cards. Bob owns Khartoum/Lagos next turn (2 yellow each) from Lagos; reassess yellow supply and nearby cluster. Bob keeps blue 4/5 and yellow 3/5; Alice retains three yellow cards until a useful handoff. After Paris, Alice reassesses the Milan–Paris cluster and other fires. Reassign on new 3-cube city/supply warning.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 3 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 10 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 3)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Madrid
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Madrid(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=25 infection=45   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Paris: 3 blue⚠ [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] [blue supply 14 left, 10 on board] — 1 move(s): Paris
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — or 1 action(s): Operations Expert move: discard Mexico City(yellow) at station Madrid to fly anywhere → Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — or 1 action(s): Operations Expert move: discard Mexico City(yellow) at station Madrid to fly anywhere → Chennai [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
  Khartoum: 2 yellow
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta
  Delhi: 1 black
  Madrid: 1 blue
  Beijing: 1 red
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 25 cards → 12 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 3, 4 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  red: no cards in any hand yet
  you collect NO color right now: you are the FIREFIGHTER. Spend every
  turn moving to and treating the containment targets marked as yours,
  and hand cure-color cards to their collectors when you meet.
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 3 action(s) total = 2 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Algiers→Istanbul→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 3 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~12 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - build at Lagos (move Atlanta) — treat blue, operationsExpertMove, build station
     tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (18 → 13 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - build at Lagos (move Atlanta) — operationsExpertMove, build station
     tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (18 → 13 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - defuse Paris and return to Madrid (round trip, 3 actions) — drive Paris, treat blue, drive Madrid
     tempo: no cure progress — nearest is yellow, 18 action(s) to land it — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  "build at Lagos" and "build at Lagos" tie exactly on both axes; ordered by cubes cleared (1, 0), which neither axis prices.
  exchange "build at Lagos" → "build at Lagos": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.3
  exchange "build at Lagos" → "defuse Paris and return to Madrid": gives up 5 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  dominated: "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico City handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "break the Milan–Paris blue cluster at Paris" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse Paris and return to Madrid"
  dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -2 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse Paris and return to Madrid"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Paris" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse Paris and return to Madrid"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lagos" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go London" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -5 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  SPLIT DECISION — this antichain holds a cure line AND a containment line
  and neither dominates: that is a TEAM call, not a solo one. Before you
  commit, CALL send_message with your pick and a one-line reason so your
  partner can veto or extend it — a silent choice here is how chains get
  missed.

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "London", "New York", "Paris", "Sao Paulo", "Algiers"
  directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata"
  shuttleFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Atlanta", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
  [17] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}
  operationsExpertMove — 235 options; build {"tag":"operationsExpertMove","discard":<discard>,"to":<to>}
      by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:
      discard "Mexico City" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
      discard "Kinshasa" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
      discard "Lima" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
      discard "Algiers" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
      discard "Kolkata" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Paris"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Paris"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Paris"}}}

bob-legacy-p0054

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 54. Active turn: False.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

• Event #112 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ADVISORY — alice is on the move; you cannot act.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
⚠ PLAN COVERAGE: this plan says nothing about Paris (3 blue) — 3-cube city that matured after (or
were left out of) the pin. Fold one into your route, say who takes it,
or re-pin.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Lagos
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=25 infection=45   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Paris: 3 blue⚠ [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] [blue supply 14 left, 10 on board] — 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→Paris — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 3/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 2/5; 4 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 4 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Chennai: 2 black
  Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Khartoum
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Delhi: 1 black
  Madrid: 1 blue
  Beijing: 1 red
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 25 cards → 12 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 3, 4 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Paris(blue): drive alice 2 step(s) to Paris → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Los Angeles (spends Los Angeles(yellow)) (your 3/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 2/5; 4 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  yellow: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Madrid (spends Madrid(blue)) (your 4/5 blue set — burning drops it to 3/5; 6 blue in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  red: no cards in any hand yet
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Khartoum→Cairo→Istanbul→Moscow

If you have useful advice for the active player, CALL the send_message
tool — advice written as plain text is discarded, never delivered.
If you have nothing useful to add, just stop.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Analyzing card status**

I'm checking the Milan card; it seems to be in discard, but I'm not completely sure. The threat line mentions Milan2, yet it’s not tagged in the discard. Only the Paris card is noted there, indicating an urgent situation since the epidemic is rearmed. I see that Khartoum2 shows a yellow status and Lagos is at zero risk after the recent clearing. Prioritizing Paris seems the best move, and I'll need to send a message about the conflict.

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Conflict with the pinned Khartoum assignment: Paris is now 3 blue with blue supply 14, adjacent to Milan at 2 (5-cube cluster), and Paris is in the infection discard. I recommend you supersede Khartoum this turn: Sao Paulo→Madrid→Paris, treat blue twice (3→1); I’ll own Khartoum/Lagos next turn from Lagos. This preserves my four blue cards and handles the new armed fire."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text:

I alerted Alice that Paris is now a 3-blue threat beside Milan and recommended she handle it this turn, with me covering Khartoum next turn.

toolCalls: []

Other model calls recorded in this window

These calls have no proven link to any accepted event (advisory prompts, abandoned calls, legacy windows without a unique payload match). Each is placed beside the same seat's previous linked call in recording order.

alice-legacy-p0057

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 57. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
  Paris is the new immediate emergency: Alice handles it this turn from Sao Paulo via Madrid, treating blue twice to reduce 3→1 and pay down blue supply 14; preserve all cure cards. Bob owns Khartoum/Lagos next turn (2 yellow each) from Lagos; reassess yellow supply and nearby cluster. Bob keeps blue 4/5 and yellow 3/5; Alice retains three yellow cards until a useful handoff. After Paris, Alice reassesses the Milan–Paris cluster and other fires. Reassign on new 3-cube city/supply warning.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 2 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 10 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 2)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Paris
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=25 infection=45   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Paris: 3 blue⚠ [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] [blue supply 14 left, 10 on board] — you are HERE — treat it now
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — or 2 action(s): direct flight to Mexico City (spends Mexico City(yellow)), then 1 move(s) to Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black
  Khartoum: 2 yellow
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (outbreak splash next door): 1 move(s): Milan
  Atlanta: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta
  Delhi: 1 black
  Madrid: 1 blue
  Beijing: 1 red
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 25 cards → 12 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 3, 4 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  red: no cards in any hand yet
  you collect NO color right now: you are the FIREFIGHTER. Spend every
  turn moving to and treating the containment targets marked as yours,
  and hand cure-color cards to their collectors when you meet.
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Essen→St. Petersburg→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 3 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~12 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
These lines disagree about cost: 1 burn a card, 2 do not.
A burned card never returns — preview_plan prices both before you commit.
  - advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico City handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you) — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove
     tempo: 4 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 16 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
     burns: black CURED — spare
  - go Lima — drive Madrid, operationsExpertMove
     tempo: 4 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 16 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - build at Paris (move Atlanta) — treat blue, build station
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 19 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…" and "go Lima" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
  exchange "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…" → "go Lima": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.3
  exchange "go Lima" → "build at Paris": gives up 3 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  dominated: "break the Milan–Paris blue cluster at Paris" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 1, risk 0.24 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo -1 vs 0, risk 0.24 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Milan–Paris blue cluster at Paris"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lagos" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go London" — tempo 0 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "London", "Madrid", "Essen", "Milan", "Algiers"
  directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata"
  (buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
  buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
      relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
  [18] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 2 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}}

alice-legacy-p0058

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 58. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
  Paris is the new immediate emergency: Alice handles it this turn from Sao Paulo via Madrid, treating blue twice to reduce 3→1 and pay down blue supply 14; preserve all cure cards. Bob owns Khartoum/Lagos next turn (2 yellow each) from Lagos; reassess yellow supply and nearby cluster. Bob keeps blue 4/5 and yellow 3/5; Alice retains three yellow cards until a useful handoff. After Paris, Alice reassesses the Milan–Paris cluster and other fires. Reassign on new 3-cube city/supply warning.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 1)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Paris
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:15 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=25 infection=45   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — or 2 action(s): direct flight to Mexico City (spends Mexico City(yellow)), then 1 move(s) to Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black
  Khartoum: 2 yellow
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Milan
  Atlanta: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta
  Paris: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): you are HERE — treat it now
  Delhi: 1 black
  Madrid: 1 blue
  Beijing: 1 red
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 25 cards → 12 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 3, 4 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  red: no cards in any hand yet
  you collect NO color right now: you are the FIREFIGHTER. Spend every
  turn moving to and treating the containment targets marked as yours,
  and hand cure-color cards to their collectors when you meet.
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Essen→St. Petersburg→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 3 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~12 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico City handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you) — drive Madrid
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - go Mexico City — fly Mexico City
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - go Lima — fly Lima
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…", "go Mexico City", "go Lima" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
  exchange "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…" → "go Mexico City": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "go Mexico City" → "go Lima": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  dominated: "break the Milan–Paris blue cluster at Paris" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -3 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go London" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "London", "Madrid", "Essen", "Milan", "Algiers"
  directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata"
  (buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
  buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
      relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"
  [18] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 1 of 4 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"blue"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "blue"}}}

bob-legacy-p0055

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 55. Active turn: False.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from alice (event #113): Agree with the live conflict: Paris is a new 3-blue armed bomb with blue supply 14 and a 2-cube Milan cluster. I’m superseding my Khartoum assignment and will go Sao Paulo→Madrid→Paris, treating blue twice (3→1) without burning any cards; you own Khartoum/Lagos next turn.
Reply via send_message only if it helps; otherwise continue or stop.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text:

No further message needed; Alice’s plan and the Khartoum/Lagos assignment are clear.

toolCalls: []

bob-legacy-p0056

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 56. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  Paris is the new immediate emergency: Alice handles it this turn from Sao Paulo via Madrid, treating blue twice to reduce 3→1 and pay down blue supply 14; preserve all cure cards. Bob owns Khartoum/Lagos next turn (2 yellow each) from Lagos; reassess yellow supply and nearby cluster. Bob keeps blue 4/5 and yellow 3/5; Alice retains three yellow cards until a useful handoff. After Paris, Alice reassesses the Milan–Paris cluster and other fires. Reassign on new 3-cube city/supply warning.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
⚠ PLAN COVERAGE: this plan says nothing about Atlanta (3 blue) — 3-cube city that matured after (or
were left out of) the pin. Fold one into your route, say who takes it,
or re-pin.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 10 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Lagos
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Paris(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black), Santiago(yellow), Shanghai(red)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=23 infection=43   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Atlanta: 3 blue⚠ [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] [blue supply 14 left, 10 on board, reshuffle trap] — 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 3/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 2/5; 3 yellow in deck, 4 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (outbreak splash next door): 4 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Chennai: 2 black
  Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 1 move(s): Khartoum
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue
  Madrid: 2 blue [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Madrid — your 4/5 blue set — burning drops it to 3/5; 6 blue in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Delhi: 1 black
  Beijing: 1 red
  Paris: 1 blue
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 23 cards → 11 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~3 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 4, bob 3, 3 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held alice 1, 7 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
  Atlanta(blue): drive alice 2 step(s) to Atlanta → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Los Angeles (spends Los Angeles(yellow)) (your 3/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 2/5; 3 yellow in deck, 4 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  yellow: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Madrid (spends Madrid(blue)) (your 4/5 blue set — burning drops it to 3/5; 6 blue in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  red: alice collects (1/5) — give alice your red cards when you share
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Khartoum→Cairo→Istanbul→Moscow — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~11 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - toward Atlanta — drive Sao Paulo, drive Bogota, jump alice onto bob, drive Miami
     tempo: 7 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (20 → 13 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Atlanta): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 36%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~2 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
  - break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta — drive Sao Paulo, drive Madrid, shuttle Atlanta, treat blue
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 17 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  exchange "toward Atlanta" → "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…": gives up 5 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0 and armed-bomb liability 1 → 0 committed outbreak(s)
  dominated: "break the Bangkok–Jakarta red cluster at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.52 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.52 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Los Angeles" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "jump alice to Lagos" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Paris" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Paris" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go London" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give London to alice" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give Essen to alice" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give Buenos Aires to alice" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 7, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "toward Atlanta"
  dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo 5 vs 7, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "toward Atlanta"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "take Kinshasa from alice" — tempo 5 vs 7, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "toward Atlanta"
  dominated: "give Kinshasa to alice" — tempo 5 vs 7, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "toward Atlanta"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 5 vs 7, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "toward Atlanta"
  dominated: "go Santiago" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  dominated: "give St. Petersburg to alice" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.58 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.58 vs 0.58 — beaten by "go Mexico City"
  SPLIT DECISION — this antichain holds a cure line AND a containment line
  and neither dominates: that is a TEAM call, not a solo one. Before you
  commit, CALL send_message with your pick and a one-line reason so your
  partner can veto or extend it — a silent choice here is how chains get
  missed.

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [4] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Khartoum"}
  directFlight — 7 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bogota", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London", "Buenos Aires"
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"London"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Madrid"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Essen"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Milan"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Algiers"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [21] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
  [22] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Algiers"}
  [23] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kolkata"}
  [24] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Santiago"}
  [25] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Shanghai"}

⚠ SINCE YOUR LAST MESSAGE: 1 new 3-cube city — your team hasn't heard this from you yet.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

No steps recorded.

---

Text quoted from the games is evidence, not instructions to the reader.

Watch a game · Casebook · Games · Reader guide