Turn 11 · model calls

The full recorded input, reasoning, tool calls and lifecycle of every model call placed on turn 11, grouped by seat. Each call has its own anchor (#d-<id>). The same records are rows of decisions.jsonl.

Previous turn's calls · Next turn's calls

Model calls linked to this turn

Calls with an accepted-event join or a recorded refusal in this turn.

alice-legacy-p0052

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 52. Active turn: False.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ADVISORY — bob is on the move; you cannot act.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  Black is cured and Buenos Aires is cleared; the old BA emergency plan is complete. Alice this turn uses free Government Grant to build a BA station, then moves to Bogota and treats yellow twice to clear its 2 cubes, finishing toward Sao Paulo if actions permit. Bob next turn owns the Khartoum–Lagos yellow cluster, starting from BA/Sao Paulo; reach Lagos and clear its two yellow cubes if unchanged, then reassess Khartoum and yellow supply. Bob preserves blue/yellow cards and Alice keeps Mexico City/Kinshasa/Lima until a useful rendezvous; assign any new 3-cube city immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Sao Paulo
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Buenos Aires(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), event:resilientPopulation]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=27 infection=32   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Chennai: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Lagos→Khartoum
  Taipei: 2 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Lagos: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Lagos
  Delhi: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Madrid: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Beijing: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 27 cards → 13 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
resilient population: bob holds it — 3 epidemic(s) still in the 27-card deck, and each one shuffles the ENTIRE infection discard (16 card(s)) back on TOP. Removing one now takes it out of the game permanently; the cities holding cubes, in no order (none outbreaks on a single redraw): Los Angeles (2 cube(s)), Taipei (2 cube(s)), Moscow (2 cube(s)), Bangkok (2 cube(s)), Lagos (2 cube(s)), Khartoum (2 cube(s)), Milan (2 cube(s)), Atlanta (2 cube(s)), Jakarta (2 cube(s)), Chennai (2 cube(s)), Chicago (2 cube(s)), Delhi (1 cube(s)), Madrid (1 cube(s)), Beijing (1 cube(s)). Cubes do NOT decide which: the committed chain is a UNION, so deleting one city of an ADJACENT PAIR leaves the other rooting the same chain, while an isolated city of the same size removes its whole contribution. Note it is playable only on their own turn here and costs NO action, so the choice is WHEN, not whether — and playing it after the epidemic is not an option, so a card worth removing should go before the draw.
⚠ FREE EVENTS — the turn owner holds this; it costs NO action:
  resilient population: removes Atlanta from the infection discard, permanently — ~0 → ~0 chained outbreak(s) committed. Stops that city being DRAWN again — not cubes reaching it. Its cubes stay, and a neighbour's outbreak still splashes onto them, so a 3-cube city you can never reach becomes permanent chain fuel rather than a solved problem: prefer a target that is BOTH unreachable AND outside any potential chain.
  P(epidemic in window) ≈ 100%, epidemic certain within 3 draw(s) — worth more right after a reshuffle, so hold unless the number above says otherwise
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 2, 5 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  red: no cards in any hand yet
  you collect NO color right now: you are the FIREFIGHTER. Spend every
  turn moving to and treating the containment targets marked as yours,
  and hand cure-color cards to their collectors when you meet.
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  hand Mexico City(yellow) to bob: meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: bob already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing
  hand Lima(yellow) to bob: meet IN Lima (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +2 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: bob already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing
  hand Kinshasa(yellow) to bob: meet IN Kinshasa (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), bob 3 move(s); then bob to station Madrid +3 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: bob already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Madrid→Algiers→Istanbul→Moscow — nearer teammate: bob, 3 move(s) vs your 4

If you have useful advice for the active player, CALL the send_message
tool — advice written as plain text is discarded, never delivered.
If you have nothing useful to add, just stop.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Considering infection dynamics**

I think better targets for disease management might be cities like Los Angeles, which has a high yellow disease presence. If we isolate it, that could prevent re-infection and eliminate outbreak opportunities. It’s crucial since LA has four neighboring cities, none of which are currently infected with yellow. The model suggests that without any existing chains in places like Atlanta, we aren't seeing any significant impacts yet. It’s interesting how interconnected these dynamics are!**Evaluating city removal strategies**

I think it might be wiser to remove a city with two infections to prevent a potential third in the future. This action takes the city out of the infection discard, but the deck reshuffles only after an epidemic, which means all discards will go back on top. With 16 cities currently in the discard and three epidemics left, there’s a significant risk coming in the next couple of turns. Los Angeles looks like a viable option since it has a high degree but no adjacent active infections. Taipei is another contender as it borders Beijing.**Planning epidemic response**

I’m considering an epidemic response plan with four key actions. The strategy starts by jumping to Alice in São Paulo to drive to Lagos. The pinned plan suggests that from Buenos Aires/São Paulo, we can reach Lagos while clearing the necessary steps. We can travel via Alice, but I’m weighing the direct route from Buenos Aires to São Paulo versus the dispatcher jump to Lagos. The dispatcher jump has no fuel, but I'm confident we can manage it and send the necessary advice.

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Your draw is next and Resilient Population is available free now; use it before drawing (UI says epidemic certain within 3 draws). Avoid deleting just Atlanta or another member of an adjacent hot pair (Chicago–Atlanta, Bangkok–Jakarta, Khartoum–Lagos), since the partner still roots the chain. Prefer an isolated 2-cube city such as Los Angeles, Taipei, or Milan. Then your plan to jump to me at Sao Paulo, drive Lagos, and treat twice fits exactly in 4 actions."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text:

I advised Bob to play Resilient Population before drawing, remove an isolated 2-cube city rather than one in a hot pair, then jump to me at Sao Paulo and clear Lagos.

toolCalls: []

bob-legacy-p0049

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 49. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

{"kind": "supersede", "hit": false, "reason": "other"}

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from alice (event #104): Your draw is next and Resilient Population is available free now; use it before drawing (UI says epidemic certain within 3 draws). Avoid deleting just Atlanta or another member of an adjacent hot pair (Chicago–Atlanta, Bangkok–Jakarta, Khartoum–Lagos), since the partner still roots the chain. Prefer an isolated 2-cube city such as Los Angeles, Taipei, or Milan. Then your plan to jump to me at Sao Paulo, drive Lagos, and treat twice fits exactly in 4 actions.

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  Black is cured and Buenos Aires is cleared; the old BA emergency plan is complete. Alice this turn uses free Government Grant to build a BA station, then moves to Bogota and treats yellow twice to clear its 2 cubes, finishing toward Sao Paulo if actions permit. Bob next turn owns the Khartoum–Lagos yellow cluster, starting from BA/Sao Paulo; reach Lagos and clear its two yellow cubes if unchanged, then reassess Khartoum and yellow supply. Bob preserves blue/yellow cards and Alice keeps Mexico City/Kinshasa/Lima until a useful rendezvous; assign any new 3-cube city immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Buenos Aires
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Buenos Aires(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), event:resilientPopulation]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=27 infection=32   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
  Khartoum: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Taipei: 2 red [in infect-discard]
  Jakarta: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta
  Lagos: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: alice, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Delhi: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Madrid: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Beijing: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 27 cards → 13 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
resilient population: YOU hold it — 3 epidemic(s) still in the 27-card deck, and each one shuffles the ENTIRE infection discard (16 card(s)) back on TOP. Removing one now takes it out of the game permanently; the cities holding cubes, in no order (none outbreaks on a single redraw): Los Angeles (2 cube(s)), Taipei (2 cube(s)), Moscow (2 cube(s)), Bangkok (2 cube(s)), Lagos (2 cube(s)), Khartoum (2 cube(s)), Milan (2 cube(s)), Atlanta (2 cube(s)), Jakarta (2 cube(s)), Chennai (2 cube(s)), Chicago (2 cube(s)), Delhi (1 cube(s)), Madrid (1 cube(s)), Beijing (1 cube(s)). Cubes do NOT decide which: the committed chain is a UNION, so deleting one city of an ADJACENT PAIR leaves the other rooting the same chain, while an isolated city of the same size removes its whole contribution. Note it is playable only on your own turn here and costs NO action, so the choice is WHEN, not whether — and playing it after the epidemic is not an option, so a card worth removing should go before the draw.
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 2, 5 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Buenos Aires (0 move(s))
  yellow: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Buenos Aires (0 move(s))
  red: no cards in any hand yet
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +1 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: bob already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing
  alice hands you Lima(yellow): meet IN Lima (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +2 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: bob already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing
  alice hands you Kinshasa(yellow): meet IN Kinshasa (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Madrid +3 move(s) to cure; HAND CAP: bob already has 7/7; the share forces an immediate discard — name the non-yellow card to shed before committing
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 3 action(s) total = 2 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Tehran→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
  - take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without the crossing (3 still needed) — drive Bogota, drive Mexico City, jump alice onto bob, take Mexico City from alice
     tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (23 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  dominated: break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: break the Khartoum–Lagos yellow cluster at Lagos — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all) — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Los Angeles — tempo 0 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Los Angeles — tempo 0 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Los Angeles to alice — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Delhi — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Los Angeles to alice — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Los Angeles from alice — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Bangkok — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Delhi — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Mexico City — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: jump alice to Buenos Aires — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Jakarta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Delhi — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Chennai — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Sao Paulo — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Milan — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Lima — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go London — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Bogota — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Madrid to alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Bogota to alice — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: build at Bogota (move Atlanta) — tempo -14 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Kinshasa — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Khartoum — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Lagos — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Bangkok — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Bangkok — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Chennai — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Bangkok — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Khartoum — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Moscow — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Khartoum — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Khartoum — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Jakarta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Moscow — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Milan — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Milan — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Bogota — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Madrid to alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: build at London (move Atlanta) — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Madrid from alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward St. Petersburg — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: build at London (move Atlanta) — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Lima from alice — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give London to alice — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Bogota from alice — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Kinshasa from alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go St. Petersburg — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Los Angeles — tempo -16 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Delhi — tempo -17 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -16 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -17 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo -17 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bogota", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London"
  shuttleFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi"
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Madrid"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Buenos Aires"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}
  [21] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
  [22] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [23] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
  [24] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Algiers"}
  [25] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kolkata"}
  (playEvent costs NO action — you may play one AND still take all your actions)
  playEvent(resilientPopulation) — 16 options; build {"tag":"playEvent","play":{"event":"resilientPopulation","city":<one city below>}}
      city: "Delhi", "Los Angeles", "Bogota", "Taipei", "Moscow", "Madrid", "Bangkok", "Lagos", "Buenos Aires", "Khartoum", "Milan", "Atlanta", "Jakarta", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Chicago"

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning:

**Evaluating infection priorities**

I’m looking at the situation: Red supply is fine with 17 cubes on board, and there are no concerns there. In Milan, I have 2 blue, a blue supply at 17, and I've held 4/5 cards for a potential cure that might be coming soon. However, if an epidemic rears its head, 2 cubes in Milan could cause an outbreak. Taipei has 2 isolated cubes with no adjacent risks, but there's an infection card currently in discard. I need to determine which situation is more urgent.

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "I’ll follow your line: use Resilient Population now on isolated Taipei (rather than an adjacent-pair city), then Dispatcher-jump to you at Sao Paulo, move to Lagos, and treat yellow twice. You can target Khartoum from Sao Paulo next turn after I clear Lagos."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}
{"tool": "pin_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately."}, "output": {"pinned": true, "note": "This replaces the standing team plan; both players will see it every turn until superseded. You have sent 2 of 5 messages available this turn."}}
{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "resilientPopulation", "city": "Taipei"}}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "bob", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "resilientPopulation", "city": "Taipei"}}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Sao Paulo"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "St. Petersburg"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Essen"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Los Angeles"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "London"}, {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "to": "Atlanta"}, {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "to": "Beijing"}, {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "to": "Los Angeles"}, {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "to": "Delhi"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "alice", "toPawn": "bob"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kinshasa"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Lima"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Algiers"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kolkata"}]}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "St. Petersburg"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Essen"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Los Angeles"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "London"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kinshasa"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Lima"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Algiers"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kolkata"}]}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "bob", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Sao Paulo"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Kinshasa"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Khartoum"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "St. Petersburg"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Essen"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Los Angeles"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "London"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "alice", "toPawn": "bob"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kinshasa"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Lima"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Algiers"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kolkata"}]}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Sao Paulo"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Kinshasa"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Khartoum"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "St. Petersburg"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Essen"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Los Angeles"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "London"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "alice", "toPawn": "bob"}, {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Madrid"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Buenos Aires"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kinshasa"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Lima"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Algiers"}, {"tag": "dispatcherMove", "pawn": "alice", "via": "directFlight", "to": "Kolkata"}]}, {"index": 4, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Lagos", "color": "yellow", "before": 2, "after": 0}], "moves": [{"player": "bob", "from": "Buenos Aires", "to": "Lagos"}], "hands": [{"player": "bob", "spent": ["resilientPopulation"], "gained": []}], "stationsBuilt": [], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "count": 2, "example": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Bogota"}}, {"tag": "directFlight", "count": 6, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Madrid"}}, {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "count": 5, "example": {"tag": "shuttleFlight", "to": "Atlanta"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [{"card": "resilientPopulation", "tier": "event", "note": "resilientPopulation — a one-shot team capability, gone once spent", "keystone": false}], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 3, "deckSize": 27, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0.6666666666666667, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 32, "perCityHitProbability": 0.0625, "threats": [{"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Chicago", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Chennai", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Khartoum", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Taipei", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Jakarta", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Moscow", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Milan", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Atlanta", "color": "blue", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}]}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "bob", "currentHandSize": 6, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": true}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 2, "attainable": 10, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 2, "attainable": 10, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 4, "attainable": 8, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}

Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "resilientPopulation", "city": "Taipei"}}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "resilientPopulation", "city": "Taipei"}}}}

Other model calls recorded in this window

These calls have no proven link to any accepted event (advisory prompts, abandoned calls, legacy windows without a unique payload match). Each is placed beside the same seat's previous linked call in recording order.

alice-legacy-p0053

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 53. Active turn: False.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

POOL MESSAGE from bob (event #105): I’ll follow your line: use Resilient Population now on isolated Taipei (rather than an adjacent-pair city), then Dispatcher-jump to you at Sao Paulo, move to Lagos, and treat yellow twice. You can target Khartoum from Sao Paulo next turn after I clear Lagos.
Reply via send_message only if it helps; otherwise continue or stop.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text:

Agreed. Taipei is isolated; I’ll plan to target Khartoum after Bob clears Lagos.

toolCalls: []

alice-legacy-p0054

Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 54. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
⚠ PLAN COVERAGE: this plan says nothing about Paris (3 blue) — 3-cube city that matured after (or
were left out of) the pin. Fold one into your route, say who takes it,
or re-pin.

ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 1 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 10 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.

TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice  (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Sao Paulo
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue), Buenos Aires(yellow)]
supply: blue:14 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=25 infection=45   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Paris: 3 blue⚠ [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] [blue supply 14 left, 10 on board] — 2 move(s): Madrid→Paris
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles
  Bangkok: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — or 2 action(s): direct flight to Mexico City (spends Mexico City(yellow)), then 1 move(s) to Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black
  Khartoum: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Lagos→Khartoum — nearer teammate: bob, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black
  Milan: 2 blue [cluster Milan–Paris: 5 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta
  Delhi: 1 black
  Madrid: 1 blue
  Beijing: 1 red
  Buenos Aires: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Bogota: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 25 cards → 12 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 3, 4 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: bob collects (4/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
  yellow: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
  red: no cards in any hand yet
  you collect NO color right now: you are the FIREFIGHTER. Spend every
  turn moving to and treating the containment targets marked as yours,
  and hand cure-color cards to their collectors when you meet.
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Madrid→Algiers→Istanbul→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~12 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - build at Lagos (move Atlanta) — drive Madrid, treat blue, operationsExpertMove, build station
     tempo: 4 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (17 → 13 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - treat blue at Paris — build station, operationsExpertMove, treat blue
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - go Kinshasa — build station, operationsExpertMove, treat blue, fly Kinshasa
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - build at Paris (move Madrid) — build station, operationsExpertMove, treat blue, build station
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (19 → 18 action(s) to land it) — bob collects; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  "treat blue at Paris", "go Kinshasa", "build at Paris" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 1 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
  exchange "build at Lagos" → "treat blue at Paris": gives up 3 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "treat blue at Paris" → "go Kinshasa": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "go Kinshasa" → "build at Paris": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  dominated: "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico City handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "break the Milan–Paris blue cluster at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Paris" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "treat blue at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Atlanta)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Atlanta)" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -3 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo -9 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "treat blue at Paris" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Paris"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Beijing (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Los Angeles (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Delhi (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Buenos Aires (move Atlanta)" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "advance the yellow cure: move toward the Mexico…"
  dominated: "build at Sao Paulo (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bangkok (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat black at Delhi" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chicago (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat black at Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Chennai (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at Khartoum (move Madrid)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Taipei (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Jakarta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Moscow (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Milan (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Atlanta (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat blue at Madrid" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat red at Beijing" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Paris (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Bogota (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Mexico City (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "build at Kinshasa (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Lima (move Madrid)" — tempo 3 vs 4, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Lagos"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Kinshasa"
  dominated: "build at St. Petersburg (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Essen (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at London (move Madrid)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "build at Madrid (move Atlanta)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"
  dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.30 vs 0.30 — beaten by "build at Khartoum"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "Buenos Aires", "Bogota", "Lagos"
  directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Mexico City", "Kinshasa", "Lima", "Algiers", "Kolkata"
  (buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
  buildStation — 6 options; build {"tag":"buildStation","relocateFrom":<one relocateFrom below>}
      relocateFrom: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi", "Buenos Aires"

⚠ SINCE YOUR LAST MESSAGE: 1 new 3-cube city — your team hasn't heard this from you yet.

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

No steps recorded.

bob-legacy-p0050

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 50. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Buenos Aires
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Buenos Aires(dispatcher) hand=6 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=27 infection=32   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here]
  Khartoum: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta
  Lagos: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: alice, 1 move(s) vs your 2
  Delhi: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Madrid: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Beijing: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 27 cards → 13 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 2, 5 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Buenos Aires (0 move(s))
  yellow: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Buenos Aires (0 move(s))
  red: no cards in any hand yet
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +1 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Lima(yellow): meet IN Lima (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +2 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Kinshasa(yellow): meet IN Kinshasa (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Madrid +3 move(s) to cure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 3 action(s) total = 2 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: (shuttle)Delhi→Tehran→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
  - take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without the crossing (3 still needed) — drive Bogota, drive Mexico City, jump alice onto bob, take Mexico City from alice
     tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (23 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  dominated: break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: break the Khartoum–Lagos yellow cluster at Lagos — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all) — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Los Angeles — tempo 0 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Los Angeles — tempo 0 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Los Angeles to alice — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Delhi — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Los Angeles to alice — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Los Angeles from alice — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Bangkok — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Delhi — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Mexico City — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: jump alice to Buenos Aires — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Jakarta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Delhi — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Chennai — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Sao Paulo — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Milan — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Lima — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go London — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Bogota — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Madrid to alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Bogota to alice — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: build at Bogota (move Atlanta) — tempo -14 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Kinshasa — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Khartoum — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Lagos — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Bangkok — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Bangkok — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Chennai — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Bangkok — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Khartoum — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Moscow — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Khartoum — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Khartoum — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Taipei — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Jakarta — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Moscow — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go Milan — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Milan — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Taipei — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Bogota — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give Madrid to alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: build at London (move Atlanta) — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Madrid from alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: toward St. Petersburg — tempo -2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: build at London (move Atlanta) — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Lima from alice — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: give London to alice — tempo -4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Bogota from alice — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: take Kinshasa from alice — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: go St. Petersburg — tempo -3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Los Angeles — tempo -16 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat black at Delhi — tempo -17 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Madrid — tempo -16 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat red at Beijing — tempo -17 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".
  dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo -17 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "take Mexico City — the yellow handoff without t…".

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bogota", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London"
  shuttleFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Atlanta", "Madrid", "Beijing", "Los Angeles", "Delhi"
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Madrid"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Buenos Aires"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}
  [21] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
  [22] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [23] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
  [24] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Algiers"}
  [25] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kolkata"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 4 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "dispatcherJump", "pawn": "bob", "toPawn": "alice"}}}

bob-legacy-p0051

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 51. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 3)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Sao Paulo
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Sao Paulo(dispatcher) hand=6 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=27 infection=32   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago
  Chennai: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Lagos→Khartoum
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta
  Lagos: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Lagos
  Delhi: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Madrid: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Beijing: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 27 cards → 13 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 2, 5 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
  yellow: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (1 move(s))
  red: no cards in any hand yet
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +1 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Kinshasa(yellow): meet IN Kinshasa (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Madrid +3 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Lima(yellow): meet IN Lima (the card's own city) — you 2 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +2 move(s) to cure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 4 action(s) total = 3 move(s) + 1 treat: Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Madrid→Algiers→Istanbul→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
  clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~13 turn(s), 3 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
  - treat blue at Madrid — drive Madrid, treat blue
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (18 → 17 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - go Beijing — drive Madrid, shuttle Beijing
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (18 → 17 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - go Mexico City — drive Bogota, drive Mexico City
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (23 → 22 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  - build at Bogota (move Atlanta) — drive Bogota, build station
     tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (18 → 17 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  "treat blue at Madrid", "go Beijing", "go Mexico City", "build at Bogota" tie exactly on both axes; ordered by cubes cleared (1, 0, 0, 0), which neither axis prices.
  exchange "treat blue at Madrid" → "go Beijing": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "go Beijing" → "go Mexico City": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  exchange "go Mexico City" → "build at Bogota": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
  dominated: "break the Khartoum–Lagos yellow cluster at Lagos" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "sweep Chennai (black cured, 2 cubes, 1 treat clears all)" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Jakarta" — tempo -4 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Lagos" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "move alice to Madrid" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -6 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Milan" — tempo -7 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go London" — tempo -5 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "go Lima" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward St. Petersburg" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "toward Atlanta" — tempo 0 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"
  dominated: "build at London (move Atlanta)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…"

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "Buenos Aires", "Bogota", "Lagos"
  directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bogota", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London"
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Madrid"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Buenos Aires"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Algiers"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kolkata"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"bob","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Lagos"}}}

bob-legacy-p0052

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 52. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 2)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Lagos
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=6 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:18 black:19 red:17   decks: player=27 infection=32   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 4 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Chennai: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Khartoum: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Khartoum
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Lagos: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Khartoum–Lagos: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
  Delhi: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Madrid: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Beijing: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 27 cards → 13 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 2, 5 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Los Angeles (spends Los Angeles(yellow)) (your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  yellow: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Madrid (spends Madrid(blue)) (your 4/5 blue set — burning drops it to 3/5; 6 blue in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  red: no cards in any hand yet
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Kinshasa(yellow): meet IN Kinshasa (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Madrid +3 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +1 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Lima(yellow): meet IN Lima (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +2 move(s) to cure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Khartoum→Cairo→Istanbul→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
  - go Bogota — move alice to Bogota, jump bob onto alice
     tempo: 4 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (25 → 21 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
  dominated: break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Bogota".
  dominated: break the Khartoum–Lagos yellow cluster at Lagos — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: go Khartoum — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Khartoum — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: toward Moscow — tempo -4 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: jump alice to Lagos — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: go Sao Paulo — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Bogota".
  dominated: go Kinshasa — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: go Buenos Aires — tempo 2 vs 4, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "go Bogota".

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [4] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Khartoum"}
  directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bogota", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London"
  [11] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Madrid"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Buenos Aires"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
  [21] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Algiers"}
  [22] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kolkata"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"bob","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}}

bob-legacy-p0053

Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 53. Active turn: True.

Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.

This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.

System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl

Linked accepted events

No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.

Recorded submissions and refusals

No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.

Lifecycle evidence

None recorded.

Recorded input

ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.

STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned this turn):
  Black is cured and BA/Bogota are handled. Bob this turn plays Resilient Population on isolated Taipei before the certain-near-term epidemic reshuffle, then Dispatcher-jumps to Alice at Sao Paulo, moves to Lagos, and treats yellow twice to clear it. Alice next turn owns Khartoum (Sao Paulo→Lagos→Khartoum, treat yellow twice if unchanged); reassess the yellow supply/cluster and any new 3-cube fires. Bob preserves all four blue and remaining yellow cards, continues blue/yellow collection; assign new fires immediately.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.

=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob  (actions left: 1)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Lagos
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:cured red:none  outbreaks=0/8  infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles, Delhi, Buenos Aires
players: alice@Sao Paulo(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Mexico City(yellow), Kinshasa(yellow), Lima(yellow), Algiers(black), Kolkata(black)]  bob@Lagos(dispatcher) hand=6 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bogota(yellow), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow), London(blue)]
supply: blue:17 yellow:19 black:19 red:17   decks: player=27 infection=32   player-discard: 2 blue, 2 yellow, 6 black, 4 red
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
  Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Bangkok: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Chicago: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 4 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Chennai: 2 black [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 4 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai [black CURED: 1 treat clears ALL cubes here] — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Khartoum: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): Khartoum
  Taipei: 2 red
  Jakarta: 2 red [in infect-discard] [cluster Bangkok–Jakarta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats]
  Moscow: 2 black [in infect-discard]
  Milan: 2 blue [in infect-discard]
  Atlanta: 2 blue [in infect-discard] [cluster Chicago–Atlanta: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 3 move(s): Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Atlanta — nearer teammate: alice, 2 move(s) vs your 3
  Delhi: 1 black [in infect-discard]
  Lagos: 1 yellow [in infect-discard]
  Madrid: 1 blue [in infect-discard]
  Beijing: 1 red [in infect-discard]

=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 27 cards → 13 player-turn(s) of draws left; 3 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: black: 5 cube(s) across 3 city(ies) → ~3 treat action(s) to eradicate
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
  blue: 2 of 12 burned, held bob 4, 6 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  yellow: 2 of 12 burned, held alice 3, bob 2, 5 in deck — margin 5 over the 5 needed
  red: 4 of 12 burned, held nobody, 8 in deck — margin 3 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
  blue: YOU collect (4/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Los Angeles (spends Los Angeles(yellow)) (your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 5 yellow in deck, 3 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  yellow: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (2 move(s)) — or 1 action(s): direct flight to Madrid (spends Madrid(blue)) (your 4/5 blue set — burning drops it to 3/5; 6 blue in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
  red: no cards in any hand yet
share rendezvous — TEAM-WIDE transfer routes (cards in the wrong hand + where to meet):
  alice hands you Kinshasa(yellow): meet IN Kinshasa (the card's own city) — you 1 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Madrid +3 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Mexico City(yellow): meet IN Mexico City (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +1 move(s) to cure
  alice hands you Lima(yellow): meet IN Lima (the card's own city) — you 3 move(s), alice 2 move(s); then bob to station Los Angeles +2 move(s) to cure
⚠ CHEAPEST DEFUSES — cured-color cities still holding cubes. CURED ≠ CLEAR: they still outbreak until treated, and ONE treat clears the WHOLE city and refunds every cube (an uncured treat only knocks 3→2 and re-infects):
  Chennai (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Sao Paulo→Madrid→(shuttle)Delhi→Chennai — nearer teammate: alice, 3 move(s) vs your 4
  Moscow (black, 2): 5 action(s) total = 4 move(s) + 1 treat ⚠ more than a full turn (4) — multi-turn errand: Khartoum→Cairo→Istanbul→Moscow

⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
  - break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlanta — drive Sao Paulo
     tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (25 → 23 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases; en route to clear blue at Atlanta — worth ~2 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
  dominated: go Khartoum — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: treat yellow at Lagos — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: jump alice to Lagos — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".
  dominated: go Kinshasa — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "break the Chicago–Atlanta blue cluster at Atlan…".

Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
  [0] {"tag":"pass"}
  [1] {"tag":"endActions"}
  [2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Sao Paulo"}
  [3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [4] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Khartoum"}
  directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
      to: "Madrid", "St. Petersburg", "Bogota", "Essen", "Los Angeles", "London"
  [11] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}
  [12] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
  [13] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
  [14] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Madrid"}
  [15] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Buenos Aires"}
  [16] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Bogota"}
  [17] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}
  [18] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
  [19] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
  [20] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Lima"}
  [21] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Algiers"}
  [22] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kolkata"}

PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"bob","via":"driveFerry","to":"Lagos"}).

Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.

Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}

reasoning: null

text: ""

toolCalls:

{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}}

---

Text quoted from the games is evidence, not instructions to the reader.

Watch a game · Casebook · Games · Reader guide