Turn 4 · model calls
The full recorded input, reasoning, tool calls and lifecycle of every model call placed on turn 4, grouped by seat. Each call has its own anchor (#d-<id>). The same records are rows of decisions.jsonl.
Previous turn's calls · Next turn's calls
Model calls linked to this turn
Calls with an accepted-event join or a recorded refusal in this turn.
alice-legacy-p0017
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 17. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #34 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
- Event #35 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
- Event #36 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (bob, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
Defer the Mexico City yellow handoff until after Alice's Beijing station/black-cure turn; do not Dispatcher-move Alice off Beijing before she can build there. Alice retains Tehran, Mumbai, and Delhi for black and builds the Beijing station, then cures black if she reaches 5. Bob retains all cure cards; this turn move Buenos Aires→Sao Paulo→Madrid, use the Madrid station and treat the 2 blue cubes while positioning to cure blue if Bob draws enough blue cards. Reassess all threats after the draw/epidemic; Alice covers Beijing/black, Bob covers Madrid/other reachable hotspots. Revisit yellow transfer and San Francisco blue share only when they do not delay an imminent cure or leave a hot city uncovered.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
⚠ PLAN COVERAGE: this plan says nothing about Los Angeles (3 yellow), Lagos (3 yellow) — 3-cube cities that matured after (or
were left out of) the pin. Fold one into your route, say who takes it,
or re-pin.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 3 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 2 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Beijing
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid
players: alice@Beijing(operationsExpert) hand=7 [event:forecast, Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black), Paris(blue)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:14 black:19 red:20 decks: player=41 infection=46 player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] [yellow supply 14 left, 10 on board, reshuffle trap] — 4 move(s): Shanghai→Tokyo→San Francisco→Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 3 move(s) vs your 4
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 4 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Kolkata→Delhi — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Delhi — your 3/5 black set — burning drops it to 2/5; 9 black in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ — 8 move(s): Shanghai→Tokyo→San Francisco→Los Angeles→Mexico City→Bogota→Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 8
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 7 move(s): Shanghai→Tokyo→San Francisco→Los Angeles→Mexico City→Bogota→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 7
Bangkok: 2 red — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Bangkok
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Taipei: 1 red
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Bogota: 1 yellow
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 41 cards → 20 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
black: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (5 move(s))
red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
station opportunities (stations enable cures and shuttle travel):
as Operations Expert you can buildStation HERE (Beijing) for free — no card needed (saves ~5 action(s) on remaining cure runs: black 5→0)
response reach — team's card-free trip to each city: Beijing 5→0, Shanghai 4→1, Seoul 4→1, Taipei 4→2 (1 cube); board-wide: 12 cities closer, 24 trip-actions shaved
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 3 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~20 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- build at San Francisco — drive Shanghai, drive Tokyo, drive San Francisco, build station
tempo: 10 action(s) closer to the blue cure (21 → 11 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Shanghai, drive Tokyo, drive San Francisco, drive Los Angeles
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the blue cure (21 → 16 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases; en route to clear yellow at Los Angeles — worth ~7 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
- defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — drive Shanghai, drive Hong Kong, drive Kolkata, drive Delhi
tempo: 1 action(s) closer to the blue cure (21 → 20 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.3 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases; en route to clear black at Delhi — worth ~8 cube(s)+chain when finished, but the clear lands AFTER this window: the next 2 infect phases face the board as-is
exchange "build at San Francisco" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles": gives up 5 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.3
exchange "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles" → "defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi": gives up 4 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~0.3 expected outbreaks → ~0.3
dominated: "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…"
dominated: "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "treat red at Bangkok" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "build at Bangkok" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…"
dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "build at Paris" — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "take Madrid from bob" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…"
dominated: "go San Francisco" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…"
dominated: "give Madrid to bob" — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.29 vs 0.29 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…"
SPLIT DECISION — this antichain holds a cure line AND a containment line
and neither dominates: that is a TEAM call, not a solo one. Before you
commit, CALL send_message with your pick and a one-line reason so your
partner can veto or extend it — a silent choice here is how chains get
missed.
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
[2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Shanghai"}
[3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Seoul"}
directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City", "Delhi", "Paris"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
[10] {"tag":"buildStation"}
(playEvent costs NO action — you may play one AND still take all your actions)
[11] {"tag":"playEvent","play":{"event":"forecast","order":["Bogota","Taipei","Bangkok","Moscow","Lagos","Madrid"]}}
forecast: the menu entry lists the infection deck's REAL top 6, in their CURRENT order, nearest draw first — Bogota (1) → Taipei (1) → Bangkok (2) → Moscow (1) → Lagos (3) → Madrid (parenthesised = cubes already there). Submitting that entry unchanged reorders NOTHING and still spends the card. To get value, send the same action with `order` rearranged: cities you put EARLY are drawn soonest, so lead with the harmless ones and bury any city already at 2–3 cubes — burying a 3-cube city is the difference between an outbreak and a card you never see.
⚠ SINCE YOUR LAST MESSAGE: 3 new 3-cube cities — your team hasn't heard this from you yet.Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Evaluating flight options and station building**
I’m considering a direct flight to Paris from LA, then figuring out how to get from Paris to Madrid. The direct flight doesn’t help with hot cities, and the charter flight from Beijing requires a city card I don't have. If I build a station in Beijing, it costs an action and would limit my movement on that turn. However, I could still make moves afterward. I might discard a city card to travel from Beijing to LA while treating cubes.**Evaluating card strategies**
Bob currently has 3 out of 5 cards and possesses blue cards for Madrid, Essen, and St. Peter. Alice has San Francisco and Paris, which might make it 5 for her. However, Bob can only collect his own three cards. I’m thinking about whether to give Paris to Bob later to help with a cure, which means I probably shouldn’t discard it. Discarding Mexico City might reduce the yellow set, but that could hurt Bob since he has two yellow cards. Discarding blue cards like San Francisco or Paris could also impact our strategy.text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "The board changed sharply: Los Angeles and Lagos are now 3 yellow (14 supply, 10 cubes on board), and Delhi is 3 black; this conflicts with the pinned Madrid/Beijing plan. My read: I should build Beijing station, Ops Expert-move to Los Angeles (discard Paris rather than black/Mexico City), and treat yellow twice; you’re closest to Lagos and should take it next turn. Can you cover Lagos rather than Madrid? Delhi remains 3, but I’ll retain its card for black cure."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "pin_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical."}, "output": {"pinned": true, "note": "This replaces the standing team plan; both players will see it every turn until superseded. You have sent 2 of 5 messages available this turn."}}Step 3 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Planning execution steps**
I need to execute a full action plan. First, I'll preview the build station. Then, I have to move operations from LA and discard plans for Paris while treating the yellow twice. I need to ensure that building the station is possible but that I can have a maximum of six stations in total. It seems like it's feasible to proceed with the ops move once everything's legal. I'll start with the preview!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "operationsExpertMove", "to": "Los Angeles", "discard": "Paris"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Shanghai\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Seoul\"}\n directFlight — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Tehran\", \"San Francisco\", \"Mumbai\", \"Mexico City\", \"Delhi\", \"Paris\"\n {\"tag\":\"shuttleFlight\",\"to\":\"Atlanta\"}\n {\"tag\":\"shuttleFlight\",\"to\":\"Madrid\"}\n operationsExpertMove — 282 options; build {\"tag\":\"operationsExpertMove\",\"discard\":<discard>,\"to\":<to>}\n by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:\n discard \"Tehran\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"San Francisco\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Mumbai\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Mexico City\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Delhi\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Paris\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n {\"tag\":\"playEvent\",\"play\":{\"event\":\"forecast\",\"order\":[\"Sydney\",\"Jakarta\",\"Manila\",\"Ho Chi Minh City\",\"Bangkok\",\"Hong Kong\"]}}"}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "operationsExpertMove", "to": "Los Angeles", "discard": "Paris"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Chicago"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Sydney"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Delhi"}, {"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Sydney", "Jakarta", "Manila", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Bangkok", "Hong Kong"]}}]}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": [{"tag": "pass"}, {"tag": "endActions"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Chicago"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Sydney"}, {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "San Francisco"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mumbai"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Mexico City"}, {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Delhi"}, {"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Sydney", "Jakarta", "Manila", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Bangkok", "Hong Kong"]}}]}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "before": 3, "after": 1}], "moves": [{"player": "alice", "from": "Beijing", "to": "Los Angeles"}], "hands": [{"player": "alice", "spent": ["Paris"], "gained": []}], "stationsBuilt": ["Beijing"], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "count": 2, "example": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Shanghai"}}, {"tag": "directFlight", "count": 6, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}}, {"tag": "playEvent", "count": 1, "example": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Sydney", "Jakarta", "Manila", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Bangkok", "Hong Kong"]}}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [{"card": "Paris", "tier": "priced", "note": "blue margin 7 — burnable; 7 blue still in deck", "keystone": true}], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 3, "deckSize": 41, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 46, "perCityHitProbability": 0.043478260869565216, "threats": [{"city": "Buenos Aires", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Delhi", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Lagos", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}], "knownTopSegment": {"cities": ["Madrid", "Beijing", "Buenos Aires", "Bangkok", "Chicago", "Chennai", "Khartoum", "Taipei", "Jakarta", "Moscow", "Milan", "Bogota", "Atlanta", "Lagos"], "unidentified": 0, "size": 14}}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "alice", "currentHandSize": 6, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": true}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 1, "attainable": 11, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "black", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}Step 4 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Analyzing game strategy**
I'm exploring the strategy for the card game. It looks like there's a card for Paris that's valuable, but it comes with a high cost. I have a hand of seven cards, and I can burn one and draw two more, which would give me eight—exceeding the limit. I need to consider if I should discard a card or play an action to help manage my hand better. There’s a list of important infection segments too. I want to make the best choices here!**Organizing infection strategy**
I’ve identified the current infection deck, which includes cities we need to prioritize. The top six cities are Bogota, Taipei, Bangkok, Moscow, Lagos, and Madrid. I can use the Forecast action to rearrange them, moving riskier cities like Lagos and Madrid to the end. Given that the next two likely infections are Bogota and Taipei, I can strategize to bury the more dangerous Bangkok and Lagos by prioritizing the safer cities first. It’s all about keeping the game manageable!**Reassessing order and risks**
I'm considering the current card order and realizing there's no immediate benefit to rearranging everything right now, especially since the next two infections are safe. I could think about moving a high-risk city up earlier, but it seems better to hold off and save that event for later. The preview shows a risk for the top cards, but thankfully, Delhi is safe since it’s not in the infection draw. Lagos does have a noticeable risk, but it's manageable given the current known cards.**Considering team updates**
I need to factor in the top six threats identified by the team. They've been updated with the latest details in a pinned message. Is there really no need to discuss it before the commit? Since we sent our choices prior to conflict, Bob might respond, but I think we should definitely re-preview everything. It’s always good to double-check how we’re approaching potential issues together!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Bogota", "Taipei", "Moscow", "Madrid", "Bangkok", "Lagos"]}}, {"tag": "buildStation"}, {"tag": "operationsExpertMove", "to": "Los Angeles", "discard": "Paris"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Bogota", "Taipei", "Moscow", "Madrid", "Bangkok", "Lagos"]}}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Shanghai\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Seoul\"}\n directFlight — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Tehran\", \"San Francisco\", \"Mumbai\", \"Mexico City\", \"Delhi\", \"Paris\"\n {\"tag\":\"buildStation\"}"}, {"index": 1, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Shanghai\"}\n {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":\"Seoul\"}\n directFlight — 6 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Tehran\", \"San Francisco\", \"Mumbai\", \"Mexico City\", \"Delhi\", \"Paris\"\n {\"tag\":\"shuttleFlight\",\"to\":\"Atlanta\"}\n {\"tag\":\"shuttleFlight\",\"to\":\"Madrid\"}\n operationsExpertMove — 282 options; build {\"tag\":\"operationsExpertMove\",\"discard\":<discard>,\"to\":<to>}\n by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:\n discard \"Tehran\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"San Francisco\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Mumbai\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Mexico City\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Delhi\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\"\n discard \"Paris\" → to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Toronto\", \"Atlanta\", \"Washington\", \"New York\", \"London\", \"Madrid\", \"Paris\", \"Essen\", \"Milan\", \"St. Petersburg\", \"Los Angeles\", \"Mexico City\", \"Miami\", \"Bogota\", \"Lima\", \"Santiago\", \"Buenos Aires\", \"Sao Paulo\", \"Lagos\", \"Kinshasa\", \"Johannesburg\", \"Khartoum\", \"Algiers\", \"Cairo\", \"Istanbul\", \"Moscow\", \"Tehran\", \"Baghdad\", \"Riyadh\", \"Karachi\", \"Mumbai\", \"Delhi\", \"Kolkata\", \"Chennai\", \"Shanghai\", \"Seoul\", \"Tokyo\", \"Osaka\", \"Taipei\", \"Hong Kong\", \"Bangkok\", \"Ho Chi Minh City\", \"Manila\", \"Jakarta\", \"Sydney\""}, {"index": 2, "action": {"tag": "operationsExpertMove", "to": "Los Angeles", "discard": "Paris"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n driveFerry — 4 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Sydney\", \"Mexico City\"\n directFlight — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Tehran\", \"San Francisco\", \"Mumbai\", \"Mexico City\", \"Delhi\"\n {\"tag\":\"buildStation\"}\n {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"yellow\"}"}, {"index": 3, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": " {\"tag\":\"pass\"}\n {\"tag\":\"endActions\"}\n driveFerry — 4 options; build {\"tag\":\"driveFerry\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"San Francisco\", \"Chicago\", \"Sydney\", \"Mexico City\"\n directFlight — 5 options; build {\"tag\":\"directFlight\",\"to\":<one to below>}\n to: \"Tehran\", \"San Francisco\", \"Mumbai\", \"Mexico City\", \"Delhi\"\n {\"tag\":\"buildStation\"}\n {\"tag\":\"treatDisease\",\"color\":\"yellow\"}"}, {"index": 4, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [{"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "before": 3, "after": 1}], "moves": [{"player": "alice", "from": "Beijing", "to": "Los Angeles"}], "hands": [{"player": "alice", "spent": ["forecast", "Paris"], "gained": []}], "stationsBuilt": ["Beijing"], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 4, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "count": 2, "example": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "Shanghai"}}, {"tag": "directFlight", "count": 6, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [{"card": "forecast", "tier": "event", "note": "forecast — a one-shot team capability, gone once spent", "keystone": false}, {"card": "Paris", "tier": "priced", "note": "blue margin 7 — burnable; 7 blue still in deck", "keystone": true}], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 3, "deckSize": 41, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 46, "perCityHitProbability": 0.043478260869565216, "threats": [{"city": "Buenos Aires", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}, {"city": "Delhi", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Lagos", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0.14285714285714285}], "knownTopSegment": {"cities": ["Madrid", "Beijing", "Buenos Aires", "Bangkok", "Chicago", "Chennai", "Khartoum", "Taipei", "Jakarta", "Moscow", "Milan", "Bogota", "Atlanta", "Lagos"], "unidentified": 0, "size": 14}}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "alice", "currentHandSize": 5, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": false}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 1, "attainable": 11, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "black", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}Step 5 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Bogota", "Taipei", "Moscow", "Madrid", "Bangkok", "Lagos"]}}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "playEvent", "play": {"event": "forecast", "order": ["Bogota", "Taipei", "Moscow", "Madrid", "Bangkok", "Lagos"]}}}}alice-legacy-p0020
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 20. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #39 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
{"kind": "supersede", "hit": true}Recorded input
POOL MESSAGE from bob (event #38): Yes—I’ll take Lagos next turn from Madrid via Sao Paulo, then treat yellow; I won’t spend Bogota/blue cure cards. Your LA plan pays down the tagged yellow supply this round. Delhi at 3 black is still a separate armed threat; after LA, please reassess who can clear Delhi promptly (without discarding its black card) before the next reshuffle.
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 3 action(s) left this turn against 3 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 2 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 3)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Beijing
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing
players: alice@Beijing(operationsExpert) hand=6 [Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black), Paris(blue)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:14 black:19 red:20 decks: player=41 infection=46 player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] [yellow supply 14 left, 10 on board, reshuffle trap] — 3 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago→Los Angeles
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 4 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Kolkata→Delhi — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Delhi — your 3/5 black set — burning drops it to 2/5; 9 black in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ — 3 move(s): (shuttle)Madrid→Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): (shuttle)Madrid→Sao Paulo→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Bangkok: 2 red — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Bangkok
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Taipei: 1 red
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Bogota: 1 yellow
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 41 cards → 20 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
black: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Beijing (0 move(s))
red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~20 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- build at Chicago — shuttle Atlanta, drive Chicago, build station
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the blue cure (16 → 13 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Mexico City — shuttle Atlanta, drive Chicago, drive Mexico City
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (42 → 39 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"build at Chicago" and "go Mexico City" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "build at Chicago" → "go Mexico City": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Paris" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Paris" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "take Madrid from bob" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go San Francisco" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "give Madrid to bob" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "toward St. Petersburg" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
[2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Shanghai"}
[3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Seoul"}
directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City", "Delhi", "Paris"
[10] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Atlanta"}
[11] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Madrid"}
operationsExpertMove — 282 options; build {"tag":"operationsExpertMove","discard":<discard>,"to":<to>}
by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:
discard "Tehran" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "San Francisco" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Mumbai" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Mexico City" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Delhi" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Paris" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"operationsExpertMove","to":"Los Angeles","discard":"Paris"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "operationsExpertMove", "to": "Los Angeles", "discard": "Paris"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "operationsExpertMove", "to": "Los Angeles", "discard": "Paris"}}}bob-legacy-p0018
Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 18. Active turn: False.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
- Event #38 — unique payload candidate; not a proven invocation join
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
POOL MESSAGE from alice (event #34): The board changed sharply: Los Angeles and Lagos are now 3 yellow (14 supply, 10 cubes on board), and Delhi is 3 black; this conflicts with the pinned Madrid/Beijing plan. My read: I should build Beijing station, Ops Expert-move to Los Angeles (discard Paris rather than black/Mexico City), and treat yellow twice; you’re closest to Lagos and should take it next turn. Can you cover Lagos rather than Madrid? Delhi remains 3, but I’ll retain its card for black cure.
Reply via send_message only if it helps; otherwise continue or stop.Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Planning flight and game strategy**
I'm considering travel from Madrid to Lagos, possibly with a stop in Sao Paulo. The cards I have are important too; I need to manage my city cards wisely. Currently, I have three blue, two yellow, and two red cards for cures. Since the game requires five of the same color to create a cure, I should focus on two colors for my collection while also potentially discarding off-color cards. I'll strategize about how to collect and utilize my cards effectively.**Evaluating card strategies**
I'm considering the situation with the card colors and limits. The team is telling me to keep blue, yellow, and red, but I might have to prioritize one color due to my hand limit. It looks like keeping all seven cards requires discarding two, which would mean no net change in my hand. I might even need to yield a card. I can travel by charter flight to Lagos from Madrid, which costs an action and discards a blue card.**Assessing actions for Lagos**
I need to consider whether we require all three cubes in Lagos. Traveling from Madrid to Lagos via São Paulo takes two actions, which leaves me with two actions. I could treat yellow twice to reduce cubes from three to one—would that be enough? Burning Madrid would incur a penalty, but I have the option to drive and treat. We can reach Lagos next turn since Madrid is safe. I should confirm with Alice that I can cover Lagos instead of Madrid.**Revising the team plan**
I need to consider if I should repin the plan since it’s currently advisory on Alice’s turn. I wonder if I can update the plan with the pin tools available to us even when it’s not our turn. Since the current plan is now invalidated, repinning seems necessary. I think we can have Alice treat in Los Angeles or perhaps build a station while Bob travels from Madrid to São Paulo to Lagos and treats yellow. Alice’s three cubes in Delhi shouldn’t be ignored either.**Considering communication efficiency**
It looks like there's a guideline saying to send a message if I have useful advice, but I'm also thinking about the overall team plan. I shouldn't waste resources, so maybe I should send a message only if I have clear advice to provide. It's also noted that I should give a short update anytime there’s a significant change since we last spoke. So, sending a concise message is the goal!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "send_message", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"text": "Yes—I’ll take Lagos next turn from Madrid via Sao Paulo, then treat yellow; I won’t spend Bogota/blue cure cards. Your LA plan pays down the tagged yellow supply this round. Delhi at 3 black is still a separate armed threat; after LA, please reassess who can clear Delhi promptly (without discarding its black card) before the next reshuffle."}, "output": {"sent": true, "note": "You have sent 1 of 5 messages available this turn."}}Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text:
I told Alice I’ll cover Lagos next turn and urged her to reassess Delhi’s 3 black cubes after handling Los Angeles.toolCalls: []
Other model calls recorded in this window
These calls have no proven link to any accepted event (advisory prompts, abandoned calls, legacy windows without a unique payload match). Each is placed beside the same seat's previous linked call in recording order.
alice-legacy-p0018
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 18. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 3 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 2 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 4)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Beijing
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid
players: alice@Beijing(operationsExpert) hand=6 [Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black), Paris(blue)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:14 black:19 red:20 decks: player=41 infection=46 player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] [yellow supply 14 left, 10 on board, reshuffle trap] — 4 move(s): Shanghai→Tokyo→San Francisco→Los Angeles — nearer teammate: bob, 3 move(s) vs your 4
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 4 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Kolkata→Delhi — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Delhi — your 3/5 black set — burning drops it to 2/5; 9 black in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ — 8 move(s): Shanghai→Tokyo→San Francisco→Los Angeles→Mexico City→Bogota→Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 8
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 7 move(s): Shanghai→Tokyo→San Francisco→Los Angeles→Mexico City→Bogota→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 7
Bangkok: 2 red — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Bangkok
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Taipei: 1 red
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Bogota: 1 yellow
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 41 cards → 20 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
black: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (5 move(s))
red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
station opportunities (stations enable cures and shuttle travel):
as Operations Expert you can buildStation HERE (Beijing) for free — no card needed (saves ~5 action(s) on remaining cure runs: black 5→0)
response reach — team's card-free trip to each city: Beijing 5→0, Shanghai 4→1, Seoul 4→1, Taipei 4→2 (1 cube); board-wide: 12 cities closer, 24 trip-actions shaved
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
- build at San Francisco — drive Shanghai, drive Tokyo, drive San Francisco, build station
tempo: 10 action(s) closer to the blue cure (21 → 11 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
dominated: build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert) — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…".
dominated: build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert) — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you) — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…".
dominated: go Bangkok — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: treat red at Bangkok — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: build at Bangkok — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…".
dominated: go Chicago — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: go Chennai — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: go Taipei — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: treat red at Taipei — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: build at Taipei — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: build at Taipei — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: go Jakarta — tempo 2 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: treat blue at Chicago — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: build at Chicago — tempo 8 vs 10, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at San Francisco".
dominated: treat red at Taipei — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: build at Taipei — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: treat blue at Atlanta — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: build at Paris — tempo 7 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
dominated: take Madrid from bob — tempo 5 vs 6, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Shanghai — brings alice 4 mo…".
dominated: go San Francisco — tempo 3 vs 5, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Beijing — brings alice 5 mov…".
dominated: give Madrid to bob — tempo 6 vs 8, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago".
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
[2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Shanghai"}
[3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Seoul"}
directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City", "Delhi", "Paris"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
[10] {"tag":"buildStation"}
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 4 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"buildStation"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning: null
text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "buildStation"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}}}alice-legacy-p0019
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 19. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 3 action(s) left this turn against 3 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 2 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 3)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Beijing
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing
players: alice@Beijing(operationsExpert) hand=6 [Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black), Paris(blue)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:14 black:19 red:20 decks: player=41 infection=46 player-discard: —
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] [yellow supply 14 left, 10 on board, reshuffle trap] — 3 move(s): (shuttle)Atlanta→Chicago→Los Angeles
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 4 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Kolkata→Delhi — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Delhi — your 3/5 black set — burning drops it to 2/5; 9 black in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ — 3 move(s): (shuttle)Madrid→Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): (shuttle)Madrid→Sao Paulo→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Bangkok: 2 red — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Shanghai→Hong Kong→Bangkok
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Taipei: 1 red
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Bogota: 1 yellow
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 41 cards → 20 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
black: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Beijing (0 move(s))
red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~20 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- build at Chicago — shuttle Atlanta, drive Chicago, build station
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the blue cure (16 → 13 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- go Mexico City — shuttle Atlanta, drive Chicago, drive Mexico City
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (42 → 39 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"build at Chicago" and "go Mexico City" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "build at Chicago" → "go Mexico City": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you)" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "build at Taipei" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "go Paris" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "build at Paris" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at Chicago"
dominated: "go Madrid" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "take Madrid from bob" — tempo -2 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
dominated: "go San Francisco" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "give Madrid to bob" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles"
dominated: "toward St. Petersburg" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Fran…"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
[2] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Shanghai"}
[3] {"tag":"driveFerry","to":"Seoul"}
directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City", "Delhi", "Paris"
[10] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Atlanta"}
[11] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Madrid"}
operationsExpertMove — 282 options; build {"tag":"operationsExpertMove","discard":<discard>,"to":<to>}
by pairing one line's discard with any to listed on that same line:
discard "Tehran" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "San Francisco" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Mumbai" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Mexico City" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Delhi" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
discard "Paris" → to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Madrid", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 3 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"operationsExpertMove","to":"Los Angeles","discard":"Paris"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
No steps recorded.
alice-legacy-p0021
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 21. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 2 action(s) left this turn against 3 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 2 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 2)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Los Angeles
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing
players: alice@Los Angeles(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:14 black:19 red:20 decks: player=41 infection=46 player-discard: 1 blue
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Los Angeles: 3 yellow⚠ [in infect-discard] [yellow supply 14 left, 10 on board, reshuffle trap] — you are HERE — treat it now
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 4 move(s): Sydney→Jakarta→Chennai→Delhi — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Delhi — your 3/5 black set — burning drops it to 2/5; 9 black in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ — 4 move(s): Mexico City→Bogota→Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 4
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Mexico City→Bogota→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Bangkok: 2 red — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Sydney→Jakarta→Bangkok
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Taipei: 1 red
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Bogota: 1 yellow
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 41 cards → 20 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 1 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 3, 7 in deck — margin 6 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
black: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (2 move(s))
red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 2 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~20 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- build at San Francisco — drive San Francisco, build station
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the blue cure (24 → 21 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
- build at Mexico City — drive Mexico City, build station
tempo: 3 action(s) closer to the yellow cure (40 → 37 action(s) to land it) — bob collects | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
"build at San Francisco" and "build at Mexico City" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "build at San Francisco" → "build at Mexico City": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~0.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert)" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
dominated: "advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you), defusing Los Angeles on the way" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Los Angeles (yellow — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "toward Buenos Aires" — tempo -2 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "build at Los Angeles" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "build at Chicago" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo 2 vs 3, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build at San Francisco"
dominated: "go San Francisco" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Sydney", "Mexico City"
directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City", "Delhi"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
[11] {"tag":"buildStation"}
[12] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 2 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Evaluating treatment options**
So, I'm thinking about the treatment plan for LA. We've got two actions left, but maybe I should consider using a third treatment option? If I treat the yellow cube once, it'll reduce to two, and if I treat it again, it will go down to one. However, I can't fully clear it. After the treatment, it seems likely that survival is possible. I need to preview what's already been done before proceeding. Let's go ahead and move forward with one action.text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}}alice-legacy-p0022
Seat: alice. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 22. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned this turn):
Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 1 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 3 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=alice (actions left: 1)
you=alice role=operationsExpert at=Los Angeles
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing
players: alice@Los Angeles(operationsExpert) hand=5 [Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:15 black:19 red:20 decks: player=41 infection=46 player-discard: 1 blue
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 4 move(s): Sydney→Jakarta→Chennai→Delhi — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Delhi — your 3/5 black set — burning drops it to 2/5; 9 black in deck; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ — 4 move(s): Mexico City→Bogota→Sao Paulo→Lagos — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 4
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Mexico City→Bogota→Buenos Aires — nearer teammate: bob, 2 move(s) vs your 3
Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): you are HERE — treat it now
Bangkok: 2 red — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 3 move(s): Sydney→Jakarta→Bangkok
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Taipei: 1 red
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Bogota: 1 yellow
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 41 cards → 20 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~5 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 1 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 3, 7 in deck — margin 6 over the 5 needed
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: bob collects (3/5) — give bob your blue cards when you share
yellow: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your yellow cards when you share
black: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY black card; nearest station Atlanta (2 move(s))
red: bob collects (2/5) — give bob your red cards when you share
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 1 plan dominates all rivals this turn.
Dominance pruned every rival on both tempo and risk. This is the priced
nominee, not an order: extend it, or play something else.
- build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2 move(s) closer to a station to cure at (free build — Ops Expert) — build station
tempo: 2 action(s) closer to the black cure (35 → 33 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases
dominated: advance the blue cure: move toward the San Francisco handoff (bob collects; assumes they meet you) — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…".
dominated: defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle) — tempo -1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…".
dominated: toward Buenos Aires — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…".
dominated: treat yellow at Los Angeles — tempo 0 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…".
dominated: go Chicago — tempo 1 vs 2, risk 0.00 vs 0.00 — beaten by "build a station at Los Angeles — brings alice 2…".
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 4 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Sydney", "Mexico City"
directFlight — 5 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "Tehran", "San Francisco", "Mumbai", "Mexico City", "Delhi"
(buildStation costs NO card — Operations Expert builds free)
[11] {"tag":"buildStation"}
[12] {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}
PREVIEWED THIS TURN, still outstanding: 1 of 5 action(s) (next: {"tag":"treatDisease","color":"yellow"}).Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
Step 1 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Analyzing forecast and strategy**
It looks like the current forecast has removed LA from the top six, but it can be reshuffled later. Any disease supply pressure is worrying since each cube is vital. The station's strategic strength should help with curing cards, but I might need to manage more fires. Interestingly, with zero board risk from infections, I can focus on building the station for better throughput. As per the user’s instruction, I should spend resources to treat or move wisely. Building this station will help!**Navigating epidemic strategy**
I’m considering travel routes. It looks like traveling from Los Angeles to Beijing might involve moving via Tokyo, while the route from Atlanta might go through San Francisco and Chicago. We need to identify the closest station and deal with the black cure. Moving to Atlanta via shuttle seems like a possibility. I’m also thinking about building a station in LA to save time. However, leaving cubes unresolved creates potential risks, and choosing between building a station versus treating becomes crucial.**Reviewing treatment and building stations**
I'm reassessing my previous plan, which anticipated two treatments but only completed one. I could preview alternatives to compare choices, especially regarding building a station. With no card burn or wasted actions, I can still preview. The frontier seems straightforward, so building a station is likely from my operations. I know that as an Ops Expert, I can build a research station without discarding a card, but I have already built one this turn. So, it's legal to build again, but is there a maximum station limit?**Examining building stations and actions**
In my prior plan, I successfully built in Beijing, but now I’m considering if I can build another station legally. Since building one is allowed after the preview, it seems like I can. I’ve invested actions in forecasting free events, building in Beijing, moving to LA, and treating once, which totals three actions. Building a station in LA would strengthen the network. We've reduced the yellow cube count, and today’s forecasted infections indicate valid station possibilities. I just need to preview one last step before submitting!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "preview_plan", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"plan": [{"tag": "buildStation"}]}, "output": {"available": true, "preview": {"steps": [{"index": 0, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}, "legalAfter": []}], "diff": {"cubes": [], "moves": [], "hands": [], "stationsBuilt": ["Los Angeles"], "stationsRemoved": [], "curesDiscovered": [], "actionsBefore": 1, "actionsAfter": 0, "outbreaksBefore": 0, "outbreaksAfter": 0}, "unexplored": [{"tag": "driveFerry", "count": 4, "example": {"tag": "driveFerry", "to": "San Francisco"}}, {"tag": "directFlight", "count": 5, "example": {"tag": "directFlight", "to": "Tehran"}}, {"tag": "treatDisease", "count": 1, "example": {"tag": "treatDisease", "color": "yellow"}}], "irreversible": {"cardsBurned": [], "actionsUnspent": 0}, "boundary": {"kind": "turnComplete"}, "risk": {"playerDraw": {"cardsDrawn": 2, "remainingEpidemics": 3, "deckSize": 41, "lossOnDraw": false, "pAtLeastOneEpidemic": 0, "epidemicOutbreakCandidates": []}, "infect": {"drawCount": 2, "undiscardedCount": 46, "perCityHitProbability": 0.043478260869565216, "threats": [{"city": "Buenos Aires", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Los Angeles", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Bangkok", "color": "red", "currentCubes": 2, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": false, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Delhi", "color": "black", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}, {"city": "Lagos", "color": "yellow", "currentCubes": 3, "suppressedByQuarantine": false, "wouldOutbreak": true, "chainInto": [], "pHit": 0}], "knownTopSegment": {"cities": ["Bogota"], "unidentified": 0, "size": 1}}, "handLimit": {"viewer": "alice", "currentHandSize": 5, "handLimit": 7, "wouldExceed": false}, "cureFeasibility": [{"color": "blue", "discarded": 1, "attainable": 11, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "yellow", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "black", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}, {"color": "red", "discarded": 0, "attainable": 12, "needed": 5, "curable": true}]}}}}Step 2 · {"synthetic": false, "servedModel": null}
reasoning:
**Revising the station plan**
I've got a situation here. I need to update the plan since Alice owns Delhi after LA if that situation still holds. Bob is up next for Lagos. Given our choice to build the station at LA instead of treating again, it feels like there might be a conflict with the original plan. Alice's moves should be followed, and now the state shows LA with 2, not 3, and Delhi with 3. I need to assign Bob to Lagos and consider Alice's next move to Delhi.**Planning actions for Delhi**
I'm considering the logistics for reaching Delhi. If I'm at LA, I can shuttle between stations for one action, making a direct flight to Delhi possible without burning my Delhi card. Moving from Beijing requires four actions, but I could shuttle to Beijing and drive through Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Kolkata, totaling four moves without treating. Alternatively, I could use the Ops Expert ability to discard another card to move directly to Delhi. I can treat three times upon arrival, which seems viable!**Evaluating station strategy**
Building a station in LA gives me access and allows the Ops Expert move to function from any station, even if I just built it. Although I can use that move straight from Beijing to Delhi next turn after discarding the San Francisco card, the direct flight option requires using a black cure card, which isn't ideal. So, with a station in LA, I can jump to Delhi next turn. This strategy is looking strong and effective!text: ""
toolCalls:
{"tool": "submit_action", "toolCallId": null, "ref": null, "input": {"action": {"tag": "buildStation"}}, "output": {"submitted": true, "action": {"tag": "buildStation"}}}bob-legacy-p0019
Seat: bob. Identity: legacy prompt window; invocation identity unavailable. Prompt number: 19. Active turn: True.
Model input coverage: unavailable: recorded without invocation IDs.
This game predates invocation IDs: this record is a recorded prompt and the steps after it, and its event links are matched by identical payload.
System prompt · Tool schemas · This call in decisions.jsonl
Linked accepted events
No proven accepted-event join is available for this record.
Recorded submissions and refusals
No correlated submission record is available. This does not imply no action was attempted.
Lifecycle evidence
None recorded.
Recorded input
ACTIVE TURN — it is your move.
STANDING TEAM PLAN (alice, pinned 1 of your turn(s) ago):
Collectors: Bob keeps/collects blue, yellow, red; Alice keeps all black cards (currently 3/5) and aims to cure black at the new Beijing station. Containment assignments: Alice handles Los Angeles this turn (Ops Expert move, reduce yellow) while preserving black/Mexico City; Bob handles Lagos next turn (nearest responder, yellow supply is pressured at 14 with 10 cubes on board). Alice owns Delhi after LA if still 3 black, without discarding Delhi; Bob reassesses Madrid, Buenos Aires, and other 2-cube cities after Lagos. Do not move Alice off Beijing before she builds the Beijing station; defer Mexico City handoff until an imminent cure/share is worthwhile. Update owners immediately if a new 3-cube city appears or supply becomes critical.
If the board has invalidated this plan or it is complete, replace it via
pin_plan — until then, your partner is assuming you are following it.
CONFLICT RULE: when your own read of the board — a signal, the DECISION
FRONTIER, a preview result — argues against this plan, do NOT silently
obey and do NOT silently deviate. CALL send_message naming the conflict
(the city and what you would do instead), then resolve it: your partner's
reply or a fresh pin_plan. A stale pin never outranks the live board.
ACTION ECONOMY: you have 4 action(s) left this turn against 2 city(ies) at 3 cubes and 5 at 2. Unused actions are lost forever — passing or ending your turn now spends your scarcest resource (4/turn) on nothing. Unless you are a Quarantine Specialist holding a shield over a hot cluster, spend it: treat, or move toward the nearest hot city. A pointless move away and back is not action economy.
TRIAGE: the DECISION FRONTIER below prices this turn's rival plans
against each other. Pick a line or extend it; split targets with
teammates either way.
=== STATE ===
phase=playerActions turnOwner=bob (actions left: 4)
you=bob role=dispatcher at=Madrid
cures: blue:none yellow:none black:none red:none outbreaks=0/8 infectionRate=2
stations: Atlanta, Madrid, Beijing, Los Angeles
players: alice@Los Angeles(operationsExpert) hand=7 [Tehran(black), San Francisco(blue), Mumbai(black), Mexico City(yellow), Delhi(black), Moscow(black), Kinshasa(yellow)] bob@Madrid(dispatcher) hand=7 [Madrid(blue), St. Petersburg(blue), Bangkok(red), Bogota(yellow), Jakarta(red), Essen(blue), Los Angeles(yellow)]
supply: blue:21 yellow:14 black:19 red:19 decks: player=39 infection=44 player-discard: 1 blue
threats (cube counts, cluster membership, supply pressure, route cost from you, infect-discard — one row per city):
Delhi: 3 black⚠ [in infect-discard] — 5 move(s): Algiers→Cairo→Baghdad→Tehran→Delhi — nearer teammate: alice, 4 move(s) vs your 5
Lagos: 3 yellow⚠ [yellow supply 14 left, 10 on board] — 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Lagos
Buenos Aires: 2 yellow [cluster Buenos Aires–Bogota: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (one draw from critical): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Buenos Aires
Los Angeles: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 1 move(s): (shuttle)Los Angeles — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Los Angeles — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 8 yellow in deck, 2 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure) — nearer teammate: alice, 0 move(s) vs your 1
Bangkok: 2 red
Taipei: 2 red [in infect-discard]
Bogota: 2 yellow [in infect-discard] [cluster Buenos Aires–Bogota: 4 cubes — matures to 3s costs 6+ treats] — pre-empt (re-infection risk after an epidemic): 2 move(s): Sao Paulo→Bogota — or 1 action: direct flight (you hold Bogota — your 2/5 yellow set — burning drops it to 1/5; 8 yellow in deck, 2 held elsewhere; spend it only if this beats the cure)
Chicago: 1 blue
Chennai: 1 black
Khartoum: 1 yellow
Jakarta: 1 red
Moscow: 1 black
Milan: 1 blue
Atlanta: 1 blue
=== SIGNALS ===
deck clock: 39 cards → 19 player-turn(s) of draws left; 4 cure(s) still needed → one cure every ~4 turn(s), team-wide
eradication: none in reach
CARD STOCK — TEAM-WIDE, all seats' holdings (12 city cards per color; burned cards NEVER return — every hand-limit discard and every flight spends one):
blue: 1 of 12 burned, held alice 1, bob 3, 7 in deck — margin 6 over the 5 needed
DISPATCHER REACH (your turn moves ANY pawn — jump one onto a teammate's city for 1 action at any distance, or drive it 1 city/action; both card-free):
Lagos(yellow): drive bob 2 step(s) to Lagos → then that pawn treats
Delhi(black): drive alice 4 step(s) to Delhi → then that pawn treats
cure plan — TEAM-WIDE collector assignment (cures WIN the game; treating only buys time):
blue: YOU collect (3/5) — keep EVERY blue card; nearest station Madrid (0 move(s))
yellow: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY yellow card; nearest station Madrid (0 move(s))
black: alice collects (4/5) — give alice your black cards when you share
red: YOU collect (2/5) — keep EVERY red card; nearest station Madrid (0 move(s))
⚠ DECISION FRONTIER — 4 rival turn-plan(s); NONE dominates another.
NOT a ranking — a curve between the two ways to lose. DOWN trades cure-pipeline
actions for fewer expected outbreaks; UP reverses it. No line is best: pick the
end facing whichever clock is closer to killing you.
clocks — outbreaks 0/8; deck ~19 turn(s), 4 cure(s) still needed
Priced nominees, not orders — pick one, extend it, or play something else.
- take San Francisco from alice — move alice to San Francisco, jump bob onto alice, take San Francisco from alice
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the blue cure (23 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~1.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Delhi): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 8%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
- give San Francisco to alice — move alice to San Francisco, jump bob onto alice, take San Francisco from alice, give San Francisco to alice
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the blue cure (23 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~1.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Delhi): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 8%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
- build at San Francisco — move alice to San Francisco, jump bob onto alice, take San Francisco from alice, build station
tempo: 5 action(s) closer to the blue cure (23 → 18 action(s) to land it) — you collect | risk after: ~1.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Delhi): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 8%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
- treat yellow at Lagos — drive Sao Paulo, drive Lagos, treat yellow
tempo: 1 action(s) further from the yellow cure (33 → 34 action(s) to land it) — you collect; clears 1 cube(s) | risk after: ~0.0 expected outbreak(s) over the next 2 infect phases + 1 armed discard bomb(s) (Delhi): P(epidemic in window) ≈ 8%, and the reshuffle re-arms them ALL — ~1 chained outbreak(s) committed over the ~3 infect phase(s) after it, cancelable ONLY by treating them before it fires
"take San Francisco from alice", "give San Francisco to alice", "build at San Francisco" tie exactly on both axes and clear the same 0 cube(s) — nothing separates them.
exchange "take San Francisco from alice" → "give San Francisco to alice": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~1.0 expected outbreaks → ~1.0
exchange "give San Francisco to alice" → "build at San Francisco": gives up nothing on tempo to move risk ~1.0 expected outbreaks → ~1.0
exchange "build at San Francisco" → "treat yellow at Lagos": gives up 6 action(s) of cure progress to move risk ~1.0 expected outbreaks → ~0.0
dominated: "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at Buenos Aires" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "defuse the armed discard bomb at Delhi (black — fires on the next epidemic reshuffle)" — tempo -4 vs -1, risk 0.88 vs 0.12 — beaten by "treat yellow at Lagos"
dominated: "go Buenos Aires" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "go Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Khartoum" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go San Francisco" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "go Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Mexico City" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "treat yellow at Los Angeles" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "give Los Angeles to alice" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "give Los Angeles to alice" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "jump alice to Madrid" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Beijing" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Jakarta" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Moscow" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Milan" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "treat blue at Atlanta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward St. Petersburg" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "take Mexico City from alice" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "go Bangkok" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "go Chennai" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "go Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "treat yellow at Khartoum" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "go Taipei" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "treat red at Taipei" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "treat red at Jakarta" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "build at Jakarta" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Moscow" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "treat black at Moscow" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "go Milan" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "treat blue at Milan" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "toward Delhi" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "go Essen" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "treat yellow at Bogota" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo -15 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "build at Bogota" — tempo -15 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "toward Taipei" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "give Bogota to alice" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "give Los Angeles to alice" — tempo 1 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "treat blue at Chicago" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Lagos" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "go Kinshasa" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "toward Mumbai" — tempo -4 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "toward Bangkok" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "toward Delhi" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "give Madrid to alice" — tempo -4 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "go St. Petersburg" — tempo -3 vs -2, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "break the Buenos Aires–Bogota yellow cluster at…"
dominated: "build at Essen" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "toward Delhi" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
dominated: "give Mexico City to alice" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "build at Mexico City" — tempo 4 vs 5, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "take San Francisco from alice"
dominated: "build at St. Petersburg" — tempo -1 vs 1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go San Francisco"
dominated: "give Essen to alice" — tempo -2 vs -1, risk 1.12 vs 1.12 — beaten by "go Bogota"
Your legal actions — this is the COMPLETE legal set; anything not named
here will be rejected. A `[n] {...}` line is literal: pass it verbatim to
submit_action.action. A grouped family gives a template plus the values
allowed in it: fill the template with one combination shown on a single
line and pass that.
[0] {"tag":"pass"}
[1] {"tag":"endActions"}
driveFerry — 5 options; build {"tag":"driveFerry","to":<one to below>}
to: "London", "New York", "Paris", "Sao Paulo", "Algiers"
directFlight — 6 options; build {"tag":"directFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "St. Petersburg", "Bangkok", "Bogota", "Jakarta", "Essen", "Los Angeles"
charterFlight — 47 options; build {"tag":"charterFlight","to":<one to below>}
to: "San Francisco", "Chicago", "Toronto", "Atlanta", "Washington", "New York", "London", "Paris", "Essen", "Milan", "St. Petersburg", "Los Angeles", "Mexico City", "Miami", "Bogota", "Lima", "Santiago", "Buenos Aires", "Sao Paulo", "Lagos", "Kinshasa", "Johannesburg", "Khartoum", "Algiers", "Cairo", "Istanbul", "Moscow", "Tehran", "Baghdad", "Riyadh", "Karachi", "Mumbai", "Delhi", "Kolkata", "Chennai", "Beijing", "Shanghai", "Seoul", "Tokyo", "Osaka", "Taipei", "Hong Kong", "Bangkok", "Ho Chi Minh City", "Manila", "Jakarta", "Sydney"
[60] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Atlanta"}
[61] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Beijing"}
[62] {"tag":"shuttleFlight","to":"Los Angeles"}
[63] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"alice","toPawn":"bob"}
[64] {"tag":"dispatcherJump","pawn":"bob","toPawn":"alice"}
[65] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"San Francisco"}
[66] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Chicago"}
[67] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Sydney"}
[68] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"driveFerry","to":"Mexico City"}
[69] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Tehran"}
[70] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"San Francisco"}
[71] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mumbai"}
[72] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Mexico City"}
[73] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Delhi"}
[74] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Moscow"}
[75] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"directFlight","to":"Kinshasa"}
[76] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"shuttleFlight","to":"Atlanta"}
[77] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"shuttleFlight","to":"Madrid"}
[78] {"tag":"dispatcherMove","pawn":"alice","via":"shuttleFlight","to":"Beijing"}Recorded output — synthetic steps record sends made by the host, which did not enter the model's history.
No steps recorded.
---
Text quoted from the games is evidence, not instructions to the reader.